Literature DB >> 8169086

Quantitative ultrasonic detection of parenchymal structural change in diffuse renal disease.

B S Garra1, M F Insana, I A Sesterhenn, T J Hall, R F Wagner, C Rotellar, J Winchester, R K Zeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined whether quantitative ultrasound could be useful in the evaluation of diffuse renal disease.
METHODS: Digitized radiofrequency ultrasound data were acquired from the kidneys of patients with biopsy-proven diffuse renal disease and transplant rejection (37 patients plus 18 normal volunteers). The results of the quantitative analysis were compared with histology results to determine if microscopic renal structure could be correlated with quantitative features such as scatterer size and scatterer spacing. The results also were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine if diffuse disease could be detected reliably using quantitative methods.
RESULTS: The three most useful features in the native kidneys were mean scatterer spacing (MSS), sigma's, and average scatterer size (D). Using these features, it was possible to detect diffuse renal disease causing a decrease in renal function with an area under the ROC curve (Az) of 0.93. The feature D corresponded closely to histologically measured average glomerular diameters. For normals, D = 216 microns and glomerular diameter = 211 microns. No histologic correlate was found for scatterer spacing. In transplants, MSS and integrated backscatter were most useful for detecting rejection (Az = 0.87), and D in rejection was similar to the values for normal kidney and normally functioning transplants.
CONCLUSIONS: The D value corresponds to glomerular diameter, and glomerular enlargement can be detected readily using quantitative ultrasound. Combinations of two to four quantitative features can detect diffuse renal disease and transplant rejection reliably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8169086     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199402000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  6 in total

1.  Improved visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Robert Muratore; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Jonathan Mamou; D Jackson Coleman; Ernest J Feleppa
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Improving the statistics of quantitative ultrasound techniques with deformation compounding: an experimental study.

Authors:  Maria-Teresa Herd; Timothy J Hall; Jingfeng Jiang; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Quantitative Ultrasound Comparison of MAT and 4T1 Mammary Tumors in Mice and Rats Across Multiple Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Goutam Ghoshal; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kibo Nam; Yeonjoo Park; Alexander D Pawlicki; Rita J Miller; Douglas G Simpson; James A Zagzebski; Michael L Oelze; Timothy J Hall; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Effective scatterer diameter estimates for broad scatterer size distributions.

Authors:  Eric P Nordberg; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Analytic Global Regularized Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound.

Authors:  Noushin Jafarpisheh; Timothy J Hall; Hassan Rivaz; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.725

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.