Literature DB >> 8168059

A technique for using neural network analysis to perform survival analysis of censored data.

M De Laurentiis1, P M Ravdin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate how a form of neural network analysis could be used to perform survival analysis on censored data, and to compare neural network analysis with the most commonly used technique for this type of analysis, Cox regression. In this study computer simulated data sets were used. The underlying rules connecting prognostic information to the hazard of death were defined to allow the construction of data sets with specific realistic properties that could be used to demonstrate situations in which neural network analysis had particular strengths in comparison with Cox regression modeling. Using these simulated data sets neural network analysis could produce successful predictive models, find interactions between variables, and recognize the importance of variables that contributed to the hazard rate as a complex function of the variables value and in situations where the proportionality of hazards assumption was violated. It was also demonstrated that neural network analysis was not a 'black box', but could lead to useful insights into the roles played by different prognostic variables in determining patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8168059     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(94)90095-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  7 in total

1.  Application of artificial neural network-based survival analysis on two breast cancer datasets.

Authors:  Chih-Lin Chi; W Nick Street; William H Wolberg
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

2.  Artificial neural network is superior to MELD in predicting mortality of patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  A Cucchetti; M Vivarelli; N D Heaton; S Phillips; F Piscaglia; L Bolondi; G La Barba; M R Foxton; M Rela; J O'Grady; A D Pinna
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Artificial neural networks for diagnosis and survival prediction in colon cancer.

Authors:  Farid E Ahmed
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 27.401

4.  Artificial neural networks as prediction tools in the critically ill.

Authors:  Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  A predictive index of axillary nodal involvement in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  M De Laurentiis; C Gallo; S De Placido; F Perrone; G Pettinato; G Petrella; C Carlomagno; L Panico; P Delrio; A R Bianco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  A novel diagnostic and prognostic approach for unresponsive patients with anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Mehdi Bamorovat; Iraj Sharifi; Esmat Rashedi; Alireza Shafiian; Fatemeh Sharifi; Ahmad Khosravi; Amirhossein Tahmouresi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for clinical outcome prediction.

Authors:  Rowland W Pettit; Robert Fullem; Chao Cheng; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.