Literature DB >> 8166187

Intensified versus conventional management of gestational diabetes.

O Langer1, D A Rodriguez, E M Xenakis, M B McFarland, M D Berkus, F Arrendondo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that intensified management of gestational diabetes mellitus on the basis of stringent glycemic control, verified glucose data, and adherence to an established criterion for insulin initiation results in near normoglycemia control and reduction of adverse outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, population-based study compared the effect on perinatal outcome of conventional (n = 1316) and intensified (n = 1145) management. Group assignment was based on availability of memory-based reflectance meters at entry to the program. A contemporaneous randomized control group (nondiabetic, n = 4922) was selected.
RESULTS: The diabetic groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and in factors associated with higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcome, such as previous macrosomia, previous gestational diabetes mellitus, and family history of diabetes. The control group was younger, less obese, and had a lower rate of previous macrosomia. The intensified management group had rates of macrosomia, cesarean section, metabolic complications, shoulder dystocia, stillbirth, neonatal intensive care unit days, and respiratory complications lower than those in the conventional management group and comparable to those of the nondiabetic controls. Other maternal complication rates, such as for preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, and infection, were similar for the three groups. Mean blood glucose levels were a good predictor of perinatal outcome. Gestational age at delivery, previous history of macrosomia, and overall mean blood glucose levels were the only significant predictors of birth weight percentile in both diabetic groups (logistic regression).
CONCLUSION: The intensified management approach is significantly associated with enhanced perinatal outcome. This management strategy clarifies the relationship between glycemic control and neonatal outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8166187     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70097-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  51 in total

1.  Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. A simple test may make it easier to study whether screening is worthwhile.

Authors:  E Rey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 2.  Point of care testing.

Authors:  C P Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

3.  Does screening for gestational diabetes mellitus make a difference?

Authors:  Mathew Sermer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The utility and efficacy of the new insulins in the management of diabetes and pregnancy.

Authors:  David Simmons
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 5.  Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy.

Authors:  Puvaneswary Raman; Emily Shepherd; Therese Dowswell; Philippa Middleton; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-29

7.  Quantitative risk estimation for large for gestational age using the area under the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test curve.

Authors:  Sollip Kim; Won-Ki Min; Sail Chun; Woochang Lee; Hee-Jung Chung; Pil Ryang Lee; Ahm Kim
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Managing diabetes during pregnancy. Guide for family physicians.

Authors:  Ian P Sempowski; R L Houlden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M Mumtaz
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2000-01

Review 10.  Third trimester glycemic profiles and fetal growth.

Authors:  Gustavo Leguizamón; Francisco von Stecher
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.