Literature DB >> 8165081

Age-related response to lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) emulsion and effect of music distraction on the pain of intravenous cannulation.

S E Arts1, H H Abu-Saad, G D Champion, M R Crawford, R J Fisher, K H Juniper, J B Ziegler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a local anesthetic cream and music distraction in reducing or preventing pain from needle puncture (intravenous cannulation) in children. A secondary aim was to examine the influence of age on the pain report and behavior and on the therapeutic outcome.
METHODOLOGY: Children aged 4 to 16 years (N = 180) who were to undergo surgery under general anesthesia via intravenous cannulation were randomly allocated to one of three interventions. The comparison of lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion (EMLA, Astra) and a placebo emulsion was double-blind. Stratification by age group (4 to 6, 7 to 11, 12 to 16) ensured an equal number of children (20) in each intervention/age group category. A global assessment of the behavioral reaction to the procedure was made by the principal investigator, taking into account vocal, verbal, facial, and motor responses. The child was asked to assess pain severity on the Faces Pain Scale (FPS) and a visual analogue toy (VAT). The scales were applied conservatively as ordinal scales: FPS 0 to 6; VAT 0 to 10.
RESULTS: Children who received lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion reported less pain (mean FPS score = 1.42) compared with placebo emulsion (mean FPS score = 2.58) and with music distraction (mean FPS = 2.62). There was a highly significant therapeutic effect (P < .001) on the self-report and behavioral scores. Younger children, regardless of intervention, reported significantly more pain than the older children (mean FPS scores: 2.85, 2.33, 1.43 for age groups 4 to 6, 7 to 11, and 12 to 16 respectively; P < .001). The superiority of the local anesthetic emulsion was maximal in the youngest age group (4 to 6) almost eliminating pain-related behavior, and multiple regression analysis confirmed significant age and treatment effects and revealed interaction between therapeutic effect and age. Although a trend favoring the active emulsion was evident in the older children (7 to 11, 12 to 16) the differences were not significant. The pain scores were influenced by the type (gauge) of cannula, but this did not affect the conclusion regarding therapeutic and age effects. There was no influence of sex, experience with venipuncture, or whether the child was anxious on arrival in the operating room.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion is highly effective in preventing pain from venipunctures in young children, the group in most need of prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8165081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  16 in total

1.  A comparison of local anaesthetics for venepuncture.

Authors:  J Arrowsmith; C Campbell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Analgesic effect of watching TV during venipuncture.

Authors:  C V Bellieni; D M Cordelli; M Raffaelli; B Ricci; G Morgese; G Buonocore
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna Taddio; Herpreet Kaur Soin; Suzanne Schuh; Gideon Koren; Dennis Scolnik
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Pharmacological management of pain and anxiety during emergency procedures in children.

Authors:  R M Kennedy; J D Luhmann
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  Use of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics in children.

Authors:  S Dutta
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Sensitization to acute procedural pain in pediatric sickle cell disease: modulation by painful vaso-occlusive episodes, age, and endothelin-1.

Authors:  Alyssa M Schlenz; Catherine B McClellan; Teresa R M Mark; Alvin D McKelvy; Eve Puffer; Carla W Roberts; Sarah M Sweitzer; Jeffrey C Schatz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Comparison of Two Brief Parent-Training Interventions for Child Distress During Parent-Administered Needle Procedures.

Authors:  Keith J Slifer; Melissa Demore; Natalie Vona-Messersmith; Valerie Pulbrook-Vetter; Melissa Beck; Lynnda Dalhquist; Kimberly Bellipanni; Elizabeth Johnson
Journal:  Child Health Care       Date:  2009-01-01

Review 8.  Comparative review of the adverse effects of sedatives used in children undergoing outpatient procedures.

Authors:  J D'Agostino; T E Terndrup
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Can Indian classical instrumental music reduce pain felt during venepuncture?

Authors:  Rajiv Balan; S B Bavdekar; Sandhya Jadhav
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  Factors affecting delivery of evidence-based procedural pain care in hospitalized neonates.

Authors:  Margot A Latimer; Celeste C Johnston; Judith A Ritchie; Sean P Clarke; Debra Gilin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.