Literature DB >> 8164452

Continuous versus intermittent prednimustine treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

T Hatschek1, L Baldetorp, J Carstensen, L Håkansson, T Möller, B Nilsson, B Termander.   

Abstract

Seventy-eight patients with advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphomas were randomized for treatment with prednimustine (Sterecyt) in two different schedules: either receiving continuous treatment at a dosage of 60 mg daily, or intermittent two-week courses with 200 mg daily for five days. The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and side effects of the two different schedules. Forty patients received continuous, and 38 patients intermittent treatment. Objective response was achieved in 66% of 71 evaluable patients, equally distributed between the two treatment arms. The 10-year survival rate was 20% (SE = 6%; continuous treatment) and 11% (SE = 5%; intermittent treatment), respectively (logrank p = 0.26). Median time to response, duration of response and time to progression showed no significant difference between the treatment groups. Median time on treatment was longer for patients treated continuously, probably due to more easily performed dose adjustments in such patients. There was a significant decrease of the white blood cell counts in patients who received prednimustine continuously compared with those treated according to the intermittent schedule (p = 0.02). No significant differences were found regarding the thrombocyte levels. The response rate was closely related to haematological toxicity (p = 0.01). Our results suggest that prednimustine in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas has similar effectiveness both in daily treatment and in a two-weekly intermittent schedule. Continuously given treatment may be easier to govern and, thereby, allow for higher treatment intensity. With respect to toxicity, daily doses of approximately 30-40 mg in previously untreated patients may be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8164452     DOI: 10.1007/bf02989664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother        ISSN: 0736-0118


  11 in total

1.  Phase II trial of prednimustine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  E M Rankin; C Harvey; R K Knight; R D Rubens
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1987-11

2.  Study of Leo-1031 (NSC-134087) in lymphocytic lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J H Kaufman; G L Hanjura; A Mittelman; C W Aungst; G P Murphy
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-03

3.  The description of chemotherapy delivery: options and pitfalls.

Authors:  C M Coppin
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Average relative dose intensity and the impact on design of clinical trials.

Authors:  W M Hryniuk
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Disposition of orally administered 14C-prednimustine in cancer patients.

Authors:  R C Gaver; G Deeb; K A Pittman; B F Issell; A Mittelman; R D Smyth
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Studies on the pharmacokinetics of chlorambucil and prednimustine in man.

Authors:  D R Newell; A H Calvert; K R Harrap; T J McElwain
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Prednimustine v cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisolone in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with favorable histopathology: results of a national cancer care program in Sweden.

Authors:  E Cavallin-Ståhl; T R Möller
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  The antitumor effect of prednimustine in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  B Hartley-Asp
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  A phase III trial comparing prednimustine (LEO 1031) to chlorambucil plus prednisolone in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J Løber; H T Mouridsen; I E Christiansen; P Dombernowsky; W Mattsson; M Rørth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.