Literature DB >> 8164276

Death and adverse cardiac events after carotid endarterectomy.

D J Musser1, G G Nicholas, J F Reed.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated operative mortality rate and adverse cardiac events after carotid endarterectomy. Efficacy of preoperative cardiac evaluation was studied and stroke mortality rate was determined.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 562 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at a 740-bed community hospital. Data were analyzed with chi 2 analysis, logistic regression analysis, and Goldman criteria for cardiac risk.
RESULTS: The mortality rate was 1.6% (nine patients). There were 10 myocardial infarctions (1.8%). Six of these (1.1%) were fatal. The Goldman Index allowed us to classify 530 patients in a low-risk group (Goldman classes I and II, operative mortality rate = 1.1%) and 32 patients in a high-risk group (Goldman classes III and IV, mortality rate = 9.4%). Independent risk variables were identified for myocardial infarction and overall operative death. These variables were then used to develop a probability model for prediction of operative death and adverse cardiac events. The stroke rate in the 562 patients was 0.7% (four patients). For the 345 patients with symptoms, the stroke rate was 0.6% (two patients); for the 217 symptom-free patients, it was 0.9% (two patients). The combined stroke mortality rate was 2.3%. For patients with symptoms, it was 2.9%; for symptom-free patients, it was 1.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Independent clinical variables can help determine patients at increased risk for perioperative myocardial infarction or operative death. Patients in Goldman classes III and IV are at increased risk for adverse events. Carotid surgery can be performed safely in our medical community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8164276     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70034-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

1.  Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to use a decision analysis.

Authors:  Tara M Mastracci; Achilleas Thoma; Forough Farrokhyar; Ved R Tandan; Claudio S Cinà
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The choice of anaesthetic for carotid endarterectomy: does it matter?

Authors:  D P Archer; T K Tang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  In-hospital versus postdischarge adverse events following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Rodney P Bensley; Ruby C Lo; Allan D Hamden; Mark C Wyers; Frans L Moll; Gert Jan de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and stenting in real world practice using a regional quality improvement registry.

Authors:  Brian W Nolan; Randall R De Martino; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; David H Stone; David Butzel; Christopher J Kwolek; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Managing hypercholesterolemia and its correlation with carotid plaque morphology in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Kittipan Rerkasem; Patrick J Gallagher; Robert F Grimble; Philip C Calder; Clifford P Shearman
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

6.  Preoperative Coronary Stenosis Is a Determinant of Early Vascular Outcome after Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Jung Hwa Kim; Sung Hyuk Heo; Hyo Jung Nam; Hyo Chul Youn; Eui Jong Kim; Ji Sung Lee; Young Seo Kim; Hyun Young Kim; Seong Ho Koh; Dae Il Chang
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 7.  Using risk models to improve patient selection for high-risk vascular surgery.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.