PURPOSE: Selecting the most appropriate surgical approach for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and concurrent gastric cancer remains controversial. In an attempt to develop guidelines for the management of two concurrent lesions, a retrospective review of patients with concomitant AAA and gastric cancer was undertaken. METHODS: During the period from January 1985 to December 1992, a total of 222 patients with AAA were admitted to our hospital. Among these, seven patients (3.2%) had gastric cancer and concurrent AAA. Six of the seven patients were treated surgically for both lesions with either a one- or two-stage operation. One patient underwent only an exploratory laparotomy because of the peritoneal dissemination of the gastric cancer. Four of the six patients underwent a two-stage operation. In three cases, the resection of the malignancy was performed first because the gastric cancer was diagnosed as advanced before operation. In one case, the aneurysmectomy was performed first because the aneurysm was more than 6 cm in diameter and the gastric cancer was in an early stage of development. Two of the six patients underwent a one-stage operation and a simultaneous resection was carried out by way of segregated approaches, such as the retroperitoneal approach for AAA and the transperitoneal approach for the malignant lesion. RESULTS: Five of the seven patients (71.4%) are still alive. The length of follow-up for these patients ranged from 4 months to 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The principles of our surgical approaches for concomitant AAA and gastric cancer are as follows. (1) The lesion that absolutely indicates urgent operation should be operated on first. (2) If the malignant lesion is advanced, it is resected first. (3) If the malignancy is not advanced, the AAA should be resected first by the retroperitoneal approach. (4) Simultaneous resection by way of segregated approaches is useful in some patients with early gastric cancer. (5) Both lesions must be resected eventually for improvement of the long-term survival chances.
PURPOSE: Selecting the most appropriate surgical approach for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and concurrent gastric cancer remains controversial. In an attempt to develop guidelines for the management of two concurrent lesions, a retrospective review of patients with concomitant AAA and gastric cancer was undertaken. METHODS: During the period from January 1985 to December 1992, a total of 222 patients with AAA were admitted to our hospital. Among these, seven patients (3.2%) had gastric cancer and concurrent AAA. Six of the seven patients were treated surgically for both lesions with either a one- or two-stage operation. One patient underwent only an exploratory laparotomy because of the peritoneal dissemination of the gastric cancer. Four of the six patients underwent a two-stage operation. In three cases, the resection of the malignancy was performed first because the gastric cancer was diagnosed as advanced before operation. In one case, the aneurysmectomy was performed first because the aneurysm was more than 6 cm in diameter and the gastric cancer was in an early stage of development. Two of the six patients underwent a one-stage operation and a simultaneous resection was carried out by way of segregated approaches, such as the retroperitoneal approach for AAA and the transperitoneal approach for the malignant lesion. RESULTS: Five of the seven patients (71.4%) are still alive. The length of follow-up for these patients ranged from 4 months to 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The principles of our surgical approaches for concomitant AAA and gastric cancer are as follows. (1) The lesion that absolutely indicates urgent operation should be operated on first. (2) If the malignant lesion is advanced, it is resected first. (3) If the malignancy is not advanced, the AAA should be resected first by the retroperitoneal approach. (4) Simultaneous resection by way of segregated approaches is useful in some patients with early gastric cancer. (5) Both lesions must be resected eventually for improvement of the long-term survival chances.
Authors: S Kurata; K Nawata; S Nawata; H Hongo; R Suto; H Nagashima; Y Kuroda; K Nakayasu; B Shirasawa; K Esato Journal: Surg Today Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.549