Literature DB >> 8163135

Effect of forceps size and mode of orientation on endoscopic small bowel biopsy evaluation.

S D Ladas1, M Tsamouri, C Kouvidou, S A Raptis.   

Abstract

Endoscopy is increasingly being used to obtain duodenal biopsy specimens in suspected small intestinal malabsorption. We have prospectively evaluated the effect of standard and jumbo biopsy forceps, as well as the mode of orientation of the specimens (naked eye or stereomicroscopy), on duodenal biopsy weight, length, depth, and orientation in 18 consecutive patients. A pair of biopsy specimens was obtained from each patient by each type of forceps in random order. After they had been weighed, one biopsy specimen from each pair was oriented stereomicroscopically and all four were blindly evaluated by two pathologists. The biopsy specimens obtained with the jumbo forceps were significantly larger (15.9 +/- 6.9 mg, mean +/- SD) and longer (0.6 +/- 0.2 cm) than those obtained with the standard forceps (8.0 +/- 1.3 mg, 0.4 +/- 0.2 cm, respectively; p < 0.001). Seventy-two percent of the jumbo biopsy specimens that were oriented with stereomicroscopy included a minimum of four villi in a row, as compared to 44% of the eye-oriented jumbo specimens and less than 39% of the standard specimens, irrespective of the mode of orientation (p = 0.02). These results indicate that the jumbo forceps is superior to the standard, because it produces a larger duodenal mucosal specimen, usually suitable for optimal histologic evaluation when oriented with stereomicroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8163135     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(94)70009-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  4 in total

1.  Celiac disease serology in patients with different pretest probabilities: is biopsy avoidable?

Authors:  Emilia Sugai; María L Moreno; Hui J Hwang; Ana Cabanne; Adriana Crivelli; Fabio Nachman; Horacio Vázquez; Sonia Niveloni; Julio Argonz; Roberto Mazure; Graciela La Motta; María E Caniggia; Edgardo Smecuol; Néstor Chopita; Juan C Gómez; Eduardo Mauriño; Julio C Bai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Coeliac disease: an update for pathologists.

Authors:  B C Dickson; C J Streutker; R Chetty
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The critical role of dysregulation of antioxidant activity and carbohydrate metabolism in celiac disease.

Authors:  Ensieh KhalKhal; Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani; Mohammadreza Razzaghi; Sina Rezaei-Tavirani; Hakimeh Zali; Mohammad Rostamii-Nejad
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2019

4.  Evaluation of the Correlation Between tTG-IgA Titer and Duodenal Biopsy Findings in Children With Suspected Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Mitra-Azra Aldaghi; Seyed-Mohsen Dehghani; Mahmood Haghighat
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 0.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.