Literature DB >> 8162931

Observer variation in the interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy.

H Kraemmer Nielsen1, S E Husted, L R Krusell, P Charles, H Fasting, H H Hansen.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) remains one of the most difficult in clinical medicine, and the diagnostic value of lung scintigraphy has been questioned. To evaluate the observer variation in the interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in the diagnosis of PE, 87 lung scintigrams from consecutive patients with phlebography-proven deep venous thrombosis and without clinical signs of PE were randomly mixed with 50 reference lung scintigrams from patients with PE symptoms. The scintigrams were reevaluated blind by two experienced clinical physiologists. Each observer evaluated each lung scintigram twice and recorded whether the lung scan was normal or abnormal. If it was abnormal, the location and number of segment defects were registered. The intraobserver agreement, including number and location of segments, ranged from 0.77 to 0.85 and for the diagnosis of PE from 0.88 to 0.92 with a kappa of 0.80-0.84. The values for the interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of PE were 0.73-0.80 with a kappa of 0.56-0.67. It is concluded that in the interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy the use of a simple scheme-deciding whether there is segmental ventilation-perfusion mismatch or not-has a good reproducibility with a high kappa for inter- and intraobserver variation and can serve as a simple routine method for diagnosing PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8162931     DOI: 10.1007/bf00175755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  22 in total

1.  Clinical validity of a normal perfusion lung scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  R D Hull; G E Raskob; G Coates; A A Panju
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Low-probability lung scan findings: a need for change.

Authors:  R D Hull; G E Raskob
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Lung scintigraphy--doubt and certainty in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  P J Robinson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Digital angiography in pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  L Björk
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr

5.  Perfusion/ventilation scintiphotography in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  A Rabøl; B Hesse; J Fogh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-06-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in lung scan reading in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  J R Hoey; P A Farrer; L J Rosenthall; R F Spengler
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  Comparison of 133Xe single-breath and washout imaging in the scintigraphic diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  P O Alderson; D R Biello; A R Khan; K H Barth; R C McKnight; B A Siegel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Ventilation-perfusion lung scans for pulmonary emboli. Accuracy of reporting.

Authors:  N T Bateman; A J Coakley; D N Croft; J R Lyall
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1977-12-30

9.  178 fatal cases of pulmonary embolism in a medical department.

Authors:  H K Nielsen; P Bechgaard; P F Nielsen; S E Husted; E Geday
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1981

10.  Clinical correlations in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  R J Goodall; L J Greenfield
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.