Literature DB >> 8161789

Analysis of Ig and T-cell receptor genes in 40 childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemias at diagnosis and subsequent relapse: implications for the detection of minimal residual disease by polymerase chain reaction analysis.

A Beishuizen1, M A Verhoeven, E R van Wering, K Hählen, H Hooijkaas, J J van Dongen.   

Abstract

The rearrangement patterns of Ig and T-cell receptor (TcR) genes were studied by Southern blot analysis in 30 precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (B-ALLs) and 10 T-ALLs at diagnosis and subsequent relapse. Eight precursor B-ALLs appeared to contain biclonal/oligoclonal Ig heavy-chain (IgH) gene rearrangements at diagnosis. Differences in rearrangement patterns between diagnosis and relapse were found in 67% (20 cases) of precursor B-ALLs (including all eight biclonal/oligoclonal cases) and 50% (five cases) of T-ALLs. In precursor B-ALLs, especially changes in IgH and/or TcR-delta gene rearrangements were found (17 cases), but also changes in TcR-beta, TcR-gamma, Ig kappa, and/or Ig lambda genes (11 cases) occurred. The changes in T-ALLs concerned the TcR-beta, TcR-gamma, TcR-delta, and/or IgH genes. Two precursor B-ALLs showed completely different Ig and TcR gene rearrangement patterns at relapse, suggesting the absence of a clonal relation between the leukemic cells at diagnosis and relapse and the development of a secondary leukemia. The clonal evolution in the other 23 ALL patients was based on continuing rearrangement processes and selection of subclones. The development of changes in Ig and TcR gene rearrangement patterns was related to remission duration, suggesting an increasing chance of continuing rearrangement processes with time. These immunogenotypic changes at relapse occurred in a hierarchical order, with changes in IgH and TcR-delta genes occurring after only 6 months of remission duration, whereas changes in other Ig and TcR genes were generally detectable after 1 to 2 years of remission duration. The heterogeneity reported here in Ig and/or TcR gene rearrangement patterns at diagnosis and relapse might hamper polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-mediated detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) using junctional regions of rearranged Ig or TcR genes as PCR targets. However, our data also indicate that in 75% to 90% of ALLs, at least one major rearranged IgH, TcR-gamma, or TcR-delta band (allele) remained stable at relapse. We conclude that two or more junctional regions of different genes (IgH, TcR-gamma, and/or TcR-delta) should be monitored during follow-up of ALL patients for MRD detection by use of PCR techniques. Especially in biclonal/oligoclonal precursor B-ALL cases, the monitoring should not be restricted to rearranged IgH genes, but TcR-gamma and/or TcR-delta genes should be monitored as well, because of the extensive changes in IgH gene rearrangement patterns in this ALL subgroup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8161789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  14 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of minimal residual disease predicts relapse in children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01.

Authors:  Jianbiao Zhou; Meredith A Goldwasser; Aihong Li; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Donna Neuberg; Hongjun Wang; Virginia Dalton; Kathryn D McBride; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; John G Gribben
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma and acute leukaemia.

Authors:  M H Bakkus; N Juge-Morineau; J E van der Werff ten Bosch
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia clonal distribution between bone marrow and peripheral blood.

Authors:  Carol Fries; Diana G Adlowitz; Janice M Spence; John P Spence; Philip J Rock; W Richard Burack
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Massive evolution of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in children with B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Charles Gawad; Francois Pepin; Victoria E H Carlton; Mark Klinger; Aaron C Logan; David B Miklos; Malek Faham; Gary Dahl; Norman Lacayo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Leukemia-associated genetic aberrations in mesenchymal stem cells of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Shabnam Shalapour; Cornelia Eckert; Karl Seeger; Madlen Pfau; Javier Prada; Günter Henze; Thomas Blankenstein; Thomas Kammertoens
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Evolution of Tumor Clones in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  S Yu Smirnova; Yu V Sidorova; N V Ryzhikova; K A Sychevskaya; E N Parovichnikova; A B Sudarikov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 7.  Is Next-Generation Sequencing the way to go for Residual Disease Monitoring in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?

Authors:  Michaela Kotrova; Jan Trka; Michael Kneba; Monika Brüggemann
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Genomic analysis of the clonal origins of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Charles G Mullighan; Letha A Phillips; Xiaoping Su; Jing Ma; Christopher B Miller; Sheila A Shurtleff; James R Downing
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Next-generation sequencing and real-time quantitative PCR for minimal residual disease detection in B-cell disorders.

Authors:  M Ladetto; M Brüggemann; L Monitillo; S Ferrero; F Pepin; D Drandi; D Barbero; A Palumbo; R Passera; M Boccadoro; M Ritgen; N Gökbuget; J Zheng; V Carlton; H Trautmann; M Faham; C Pott
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Immune Gene Rearrangements: Unique Signatures for Tracing Physiological Lymphocytes and Leukemic Cells.

Authors:  Michaela Kotrova; Nikos Darzentas; Christiane Pott; Claudia D Baldus; Monika Brüggemann
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.