| Literature DB >> 8161715 |
M Bialer1, S Hadad, G Golomb, S Barel, E Samara, O Abu Salach, N Berkman, H D Danenberg, J Ben David, D Caron.
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of two new sustained-release (SR) products of diltiazem, Dilapress 120 mg tablets and Dilapress 240 mg tablets, was analysed and characterized in three different studies, in comparison to the following diltiazem SR formulations: Cardizem Retard, Cardizem SR, and Cardizem CD. Dilapress 120, designated for twice-daily dosing, was found to be bioequivalent to Cardizem SR and to Cardizem Retard with mean (+/- SD) relative bioavailability values of 99 +/- 27% and 113 +/- 38%, respectively. Dilapress 240, designed for once-a-day treatment, was found to have a slower absorption rate than Cardizem SR and its extent of absorption was 56 +/- 19% relative to that of Cardizem SR. However, the bioavailability of Dilapress 240 relative to that of Cardizem CD was 118 +/- 46%, indicating that the bioavailability of Cardizem CD relative to that of Cardizem SR was only 54 +/- 29%. Diltiazem is partially available due to a saturable liver first-pass effect. A high dose of Cardizem SR may partially escape this first-pass effect and, thus, achieve a higher extent of absorption than a slower SR product. Consequently, SR products of diltiazem designed for once-daily treatment may not reach the saturation stage in the liver first-pass effect process that diltiazem is susceptible to. Consequently, a twice-daily SR product of diltiazem cannot serve as a reference for extent of absorption assessments of a once-daily SR product.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1994 PMID: 8161715 DOI: 10.1002/bdd.2510150104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biopharm Drug Dispos ISSN: 0142-2782 Impact factor: 1.627