Literature DB >> 8161524

Comparative equilibrium denaturation studies of the neurotrophins: nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin 3, and neurotrophin 4/5.

D E Timm1, P L de Haseth, K E Neet.   

Abstract

The neurotrophins are a family of small dimeric proteins required for the development and survival of vertebrate neurons. Solvent denaturation studies were used to compare recombinant human nerve growth factor (hNGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin 3 (NT-3), and neurotrophin 4/5 (NT-4/5) to nerve growth factor isolated from mouse submaxillary glands (mNGF). Although greater than 50% sequence identity is conserved among this family, significant structural differences were revealed by the folding and unfolding of these proteins. Denaturation in guanidine hydrochloride and renaturation at pH 7 and 3.5 were monitored by fluorescence intensity, fluorescence polarization, and circular dichroism. The midpoint of equilibrium unfolding curves for all four neurotrophins was independent of the technique but was dependent on protein concentration, indicating that a two-state model involving native neurotrophin dimers and denatured neurotrophin monomers (N2 = 2D) describes the equilibrium between folded and unfolded neurotrophins. The conformational stabilities of the dimeric neurotrophins revealed that mNGF had the lowest conformational stability (19.3 kcal/mol); hNGF, NT-3, and NT-4/5 had intermediate stabilities, and BDNF had the highest stability (26.4 kcal/mol). Recovery of native spectroscopic characteristics upon removal of denaturant indicated that the unfolding process is reversible. Accordingly, unfolding and refolding curves were coincident for mNGF or NT-4/5 at pH 7 and 3.5 and for BDNF at pH 3.5. However, BDNF and NT-3 unfolding and refolding curves were not coincident at pH 7. The stability of the neurotrophins decreased as pH decreased, with compact monomeric intermediates (N2 = [2I] = 2D) becoming populated below pH 4. The differences in stability, pH dependence, and coincidence of refolding curves distinguish the homologous structures of the neurotrophins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8161524     DOI: 10.1021/bi00181a602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  11 in total

1.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism.

Authors:  Yaakov Levy; Peter G Wolynes; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A common mechanism for recombinant human NGF, BDNF, NT-3, and murine NGF slow unfolding.

Authors:  L R De Young; C H Schmelzer; L E Burton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Identification of critical residues within the conserved and specificity patches of nerve growth factor leading to survival or differentiation.

Authors:  Sidharth Mahapatra; Hrishikesh Mehta; Sang B Woo; Kenneth E Neet
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Unfolding and refolding of dimeric creatine kinase equilibrium and kinetic studies.

Authors:  Y X Fan; J M Zhou; H Kihara; C L Tsou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Mutational studies of conserved residues in the dimer interface of nerve growth factor.

Authors:  M Guo; S L Meyer; H Kaur; J J Gao; K E Neet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Mechanism and evolution of protein dimerization.

Authors:  D Xu; C J Tsai; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 7.  Conformational stability of dimeric proteins: quantitative studies by equilibrium denaturation.

Authors:  K E Neet; D E Timm
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  RhNGF slow unfolding is not due to proline isomerization: possibility of a cystine knot loop-threading mechanism.

Authors:  L R De Young; L E Burton; J Liu; M F Powell; C H Schmelzer; N J Skelton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A decision tree model for the prediction of homodimer folding mechanism.

Authors:  Abishek Suresh; Velmurugan Karthikraja; Sajitha Lulu; Uma Kangueane; Pandjassarame Kangueane
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2009-11-17

10.  Structural features differentiate the mechanisms between 2S (2 state) and 3S (3 state) folding homodimers.

Authors:  Lei Li; Kannan Gunasekaran; Jacob Gah-Kok Gan; Cui Zhanhua; Paul Shapshak; Meena Kishore Sakharkar; Pandjassarame Kangueane
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2005-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.