Literature DB >> 8160391

Separable red-green and luminance detectors for small flashes.

A Chaparro1, C F Stromeyer, R E Kronauer, R T Eskew.   

Abstract

Detection contours were measured in L and M cone contrast coordinates for foveal flashes of 200 msec duration and 2.3, 5, 10 and 15 min arc diameter on a bright yellow field. The test flash consisted of simultaneous incremental and decremental red and green lights in various amplitude ratios. At all sizes, the most sensitive detection mechanism was not a luminance mechanism, but rather a red-green mechanism that responds to the linear difference of equally weighted L and M cone contrasts, and signals red or green sensations at the detection threshold. Both temporal and spatial integration were greater for red-green detection than luminance detection. A coincident, subthreshold, yellow flash (a luminance pedestal) did not affect the threshold of the red-green mechanism. Such a pedestal is a sum of equal L and M cone contrast--it represents a vector parallel to the red-green detection contour and thus is expected not to stimulate directly the red-green mechanism. When suprathreshold, the coincident pedestal facilitated chromatic detection by approximately 2x at all tested sizes; intense pedestals did not mask chromatic detection. This insensitivity to intense luminance pedestals further indicates that the red-green mechanism has fixed spectral tuning with balanced opponent L and M contrast inputs. This view of fixed spectral weights contrasts with the "variable tuning hypothesis", which postulates that the weights change with spatial-temporal variations in the test stimulus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8160391     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90214-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Mesopic luminance assessed with minimally distinct border perception.

Authors:  Sabine Raphael; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Do color appearance judgments interfere with detection of small threshold stimuli?

Authors:  Darren E Koenig; Heidi J Hofer
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Measurements of neuronal color tuning: Procedures, pitfalls, and alternatives.

Authors:  J Patrick Weller; Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Texture variations suppress suprathreshold brightness and colour variations.

Authors:  Andrew J Schofield; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of Spatial and Chromatic Noise on Luminance Discrimination.

Authors:  Leticia Miquilini; Natalie A Walker; Erika A Odigie; Diego Leite Guimarães; Railson Cruz Salomão; Eliza Maria Costa Brito Lacerda; Maria Izabel Tentes Cortes; Luiz Carlos de Lima Silveira; Malinda E C Fitzgerald; Dora Fix Ventura; Givago Silva Souza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.