Literature DB >> 8160196

Induction of respiratory hypersensitivity to diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) in guinea pigs. Influence of route of exposure.

N J Rattray1, P A Botham, P M Hext, D R Woodcock, I Fielding, R J Dearman, I Kimber.   

Abstract

The induction of respiratory sensitization in guinea pigs to diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI), a known human respiratory allergen, has been investigated and different routes of exposure compared. Guinea pigs were exposed to MDI by i.d. injection, by topical application or by inhalation. Pulmonary hypersensitivity was measured subsequently as a function of changes in respiratory rate following challenge with atmospheres containing MDI. In addition, contact hypersensitivity was measured by topical challenge and antibody responses evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA). Attempts to sensitize guinea pigs by inhalation exposure to MDI were unsuccessful. Antibody responses and contact sensitization were both infrequent and low grade, and no animals exhibited pulmonary responses following challenge with atmospheric MDI. In contrast, sensitization by either i.d. injection or topical application of MDI induced antibody responses in the majority of animals. Moreover, a proportion of animals in each case exhibited pulmonary responses following subsequent inhalation challenge. These data indicate that the route of exposure influences markedly the effectiveness of sensitization to respiratory allergens such as MDI and that skin contact may be an important cause of occupational respiratory allergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8160196     DOI: 10.1016/0300-483x(94)90108-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  17 in total

1.  Airborne isocyanate exposures in the collision repair industry and a comparison to occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Carolyn Reeb-Whitaker; Stephen G Whittaker; Diana M Ceballos; Elisa C Weiland; Sheila L Flack; Kenneth W Fent; Jennifer M Thomasen; Linda G Trelles Gaines; Leena A Nylander-French
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Occupational exposure to HDI: progress and challenges in biomarker analysis.

Authors:  Sheila L Flack; Louise M Ball; Leena A Nylander-French
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  Dermal, inhalation, and internal exposure to 1,6-HDI and its oligomers in car body repair shop workers and industrial spray painters.

Authors:  A Pronk; F Yu; J Vlaanderen; E Tielemans; L Preller; I Bobeldijk; J A Deddens; U Latza; X Baur; D Heederik
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Cell and molecular biology of chemical allergy.

Authors:  I Kimber; R J Dearman
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 5.  Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; Alan Poole; David A Basketter
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  Biological monitoring to assess exposure from use of isocyanates in motor vehicle repair.

Authors:  N R Williams; K Jones; J Cocker
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) in 19 French polyurethane industries.

Authors:  A Robert; P Ducos; J M Francin; P Marsan
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  In vivo models of occupational asthma due to low molecular weight chemicals.

Authors:  J P Hayes; A J Newman Taylor
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 9.  Skin exposure and asthma: is there a connection?

Authors:  Carrie A Redlich
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2010-05

10.  Understanding factors that influence protective glove use among automotive spray painters.

Authors:  Diana Ceballos; Carolyn Reeb-Whitaker; Patricia Glazer; Helen Murphy-Robinson; Michael Yost
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.