Literature DB >> 8160096

Radiation therapy for brain metastases from lung carcinoma. Prospective randomized trial according to the level of lactate dehydrogenase.

M Chatani1, Y Matayoshi, N Masaki, T Inoue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since September 1980 we have been conducting a prospective randomized trial to determine the best treatment schedule for radiation therapy (XRT) on brain metastasis from lung carcinoma. The first trial (September 1980 to December 1984) was randomly allocated by two different time-dose radiotherapy schemes, i.e., 30 Gy/ten fractions/two weeks versus 50 Gy/20 fractions/four weeks. Treatment results showed no significant difference in neurological improvement and survival between the two arms and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as the most important prognostic factor. The present study (January 1985 to April 1992) examines two sequential trials stratified by the level of LDH enrolled 162 patients with brain metastasis from lung carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Whole brain dose was selected for 30 Gy/ten fractions/two weeks (group A, n = 46) or 50 Gy/20 fractions/four weeks (group B, n = 46) in the group with normal LDH and 30 Gy/ten fractions/two weeks (group C, n = 35) or 20 Gy/five fractions/one week (group D, n = 35) in the group with high LDH, while the treatment fields were shrunk at 30 Gy in group B if possible.
RESULTS: The final results showed the facts that 1. the most important prognostic factor, according to Cox's multivariate analysis, was also the level of LDH in the second trial, 2. the incidence of acute side effects showed the trend toward depending upon a single dose, i.e., group A (3 Gy/fraction); 35% versus group B (2.5 Gy/fraction); 21% (p = 0.165) and group C (3 Gy/fraction); 23% versus group D (4 Gy/fraction); 45% (p = 0.044), 3. median survival time and one-year survival rates were 5.4 months and 21% in group A; 4.8 months and 17% in group B; 3.4 months and 6% in group C; and 2.4 months and 4% in group D, respectively, and survival curves showed no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups in each LDH group, 4. improvement in neurologic function appeared to increase with total dosage escalation, i.e., 41% in group A versus 45% in group B and 35% in group C versus 21% in group D (p = 0.13).
CONCLUSION: A short course (30 Gy/ten fractions/two weeks) is an advantageous XRT because of the short treatment time for normal LDH and neurological improvement and minor toxicity for the high LDH group, while an optional treatment may be necessary for the selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8160096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  15 in total

Review 1.  Management of brain metastasis: past lessons, modern management, and future considerations.

Authors:  Eugene Koay; Erik P Sulman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: reframing hope in caregivers and patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Jacqueline Sze; Stephen Marisette; Diane Williams; Joyce Nyhof-Young; Dauna Crooks; Amna Husain; Andrea Bezjak; Rebecca K S Wong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  KPS/LDH index: a simple tool for identifying patients with metastatic melanoma who are unlikely to benefit from palliative whole brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Richard Partl; Gerd Fastner; Julia Kaiser; Elisabeth Kronhuber; Klaudia Cetin-Strohmer; Claudia Steffal; Barbara Böhmer-Breitfelder; Johannes Mayer; Alexander Avian; Andrea Berghold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  The impact of tumour histology and recursive partitioning analysis classification on the prognosis of patients treated with whole-brain hypofractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases: analysis of 382 patients.

Authors:  M Buglione; L Bandera; S Grisanti; N Pasinetti; P Borghetti; F Barbera; L Triggiani; L Costa; B Shehi; B Bonetti; S Magrini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  The role of whole brain radiation therapy in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Laurie E Gaspar; Minesh P Mehta; Roy A Patchell; Stuart H Burri; Paula D Robinson; Rachel E Morris; Mario Ammirati; David W Andrews; Anthony L Asher; Charles S Cobbs; Douglas Kondziolka; Mark E Linskey; Jay S Loeffler; Michael McDermott; Tom Mikkelsen; Jeffrey J Olson; Nina A Paleologos; Timothy C Ryken; Steven N Kalkanis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Chikao Sugie; Hiromitsu Iwata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer: better outcomes through current therapies and utilization of molecularly targeted approaches.

Authors:  Rimas V Lukas; Maciej S Lesniak; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-01

8.  Towards improved prognostic scores predicting survival in patients with brain metastases: a pilot study of serum lactate dehydrogenase levels.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Kirsten Marienhagen; Astrid Dalhaug; Jan Norum
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 9.  Whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  May N Tsao; Wei Xu; Rebecca Ks Wong; Nancy Lloyd; Normand Laperriere; Arjun Sahgal; Eileen Rakovitch; Edward Chow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-25

Review 10.  Prognostic indices for brain metastases--usefulness and challenges.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.