Literature DB >> 8159601

Venous irritation related to intravenous administration of phenytoin versus fosphenytoin.

B D Jamerson1, G E Dukes, K L Brouwer, K H Donn, J A Messenheimer, J R Powell.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency, severity, and time course of venous irritation after administration of a single intravenous dose of phenytoin with an equimolar dose of fosphenytoin, a water-soluble phenytoin prodrug.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, two-period, crossover study.
SETTING: University hospital clinical research unit. PATIENTS: Twelve healthy volunteers within 15% of ideal body weight and with no clinically significant abnormalities on physical examination, medical history, or laboratory assessment.
INTERVENTIONS: Volunteers randomly received a 30-minute infusion of phenytoin sodium 250 mg (250 mg/5 ml) or an equimolar dose of fosphenytoin 375 mg (375 mg/5 ml). Subjects returned for the crossover treatment 14-21 days later.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjects assessed venous irritation (pain, burning, itching), and investigators evaluated phlebitis (erythema, swelling, tenderness), induration, exudation, and cording. Phenytoin was associated with a significantly higher degree of pain at the infusion site in all subjects and a significant degree of phlebitis in eight subjects (p < 0.05); cording occurred in six subjects. The time course of phenytoin-induced phlebitis was bimodal. Erythema and tenderness were prominent at the end of the infusion and again at 24 hours. Cording was first noted between 24 hours and 1 week after infusion. In contrast, fosphenytoin was associated with mild pain in two subjects, one incident of phlebitis, and no erythema or cording.
CONCLUSIONS: Fosphenytoin administration resulted in significantly less venous irritation and phlebitis compared with an equimolar dose of phenytoin. The clinical use of this water-soluble phenytoin prodrug should minimize the frequency and severity of infusion-site reactions and should allow convenient, rapid, intravenous administration of drug, undiluted or admixed with intravenous solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8159601     DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1994.tb02788.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  9 in total

1.  Managing status epilepticus. New drug offers real advantages.

Authors:  M T Heafield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

2.  Recent and future advances in the treatment of status epilepticus.

Authors:  Felix Rosenow; Susanne Knake
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 3.  Purple Glove Syndrome after Phenytoin or Fosphenytoin Administration: Review of Reported Cases and Recommendations for Prevention.

Authors:  Lyudmila A Garbovsky; Byron C Drumheller; Jeanmarie Perrone
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Fosphenytoin. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  S M Holliday; P Benfield; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

Authors:  Trudy Pang; Frank W Drislane
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of phenytoin and fosphenytoin in children with severe malaria and status epilepticus.

Authors:  Bernhards R Ogutu; Charles R J C Newton; Simon N Muchohi; Godfrey O Otieno; Geoffrey Edwards; William M Watkins; Gilbert O Kokwaro
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Bioavailability of intravenous fosphenytoin sodium in healthy Japanese volunteers.

Authors:  Yushi Inoue; Naotaka Usui; Tadayuki Hiroki; Kenji Shimizu; Susumu Kobayashi; Shigeki Shimasaki
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.441

8.  Fosphenytoin for the treatment of status epilepticus: an evidence-based assessment of its clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew Thomson
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2005-03-31

Review 9.  Salts of Therapeutic Agents: Chemical, Physicochemical, and Biological Considerations.

Authors:  Deepak Gupta; Deepak Bhatia; Vivek Dave; Vijaykumar Sutariya; Sheeba Varghese Gupta
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.