Literature DB >> 8159446

The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation.

Katharine Andrews1, Maria Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

The threshold of a cutaneous withdrawal reflex, elicited by calibrated von Frey hairs applied to the foot and leg, has been used to study the development of spinal sensory processing in a group of 50 preterm and full-term infants ranging from 27.5 to 42.5 weeks postconceptional age (PCA). Data sets (108) were collected on initial threshold, the effects of repeated innocuous stimuli, the receptive field of the withdrawal reflex, and the effect of a contralateral stimulus. As reported previously (Fitzgerald et al. 1988, 1989), there was a correlation between PCA and initial threshold. The mean threshold at 29 weeks was 0.237 g (S.E.M. 0.042), whereas the mean threshold at 41 weeks was 0.980 g (S.E.M. 0.134). Repeated stimulation with von Frey hairs led to a significant lowering of threshold or "sensitization" of the reflex in infants of up to 35 weeks PCA. Thereafter, the decrease in threshold was not significant, and habituation was observed. From 27.5 weeks PCA, it was possible to elicit the withdrawal reflex from the whole limb as far up as the top of the thigh and buttock. Below 30 weeks PCA, the thresholds within this receptive field were uniform, but after 30 weeks a gradient of thresholds was observed increasing progressively from the sole of the foot towards the knee. The application of a maintained stimulus to the contralateral limb significantly inhibited withdrawal reflex responses to ipsilateral von Frey hair stimulation, across all age bands. These results illustrate postnatal changes in sensory processing within the human spinal cord.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8159446     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90154-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  50 in total

1.  Local anaesthetic effect of topical amethocaine gel in neonates: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Jain; N Rutter
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Assessment and management of pain in neonates.

Authors:  B J Stevens; L S Franck
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Can fetuses feel pain?

Authors:  Stuart W G Derbyshire
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-15

4.  Are there long-term consequences of pain in newborn or very young infants?

Authors:  Gayle Giboney Page
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Do fetuses feel pain? Reflex responses do not necessarily signify pain.

Authors:  A R Lloyd-Thomas; M Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-28

6.  Skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care) analgesia for preterm infant heel stick.

Authors:  Susan M Ludington-Hoe; Robert Hosseini; Deborah L Torowicz
Journal:  AACN Clin Issues       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep

Review 7.  The postnatal development of spinal sensory processing.

Authors:  M Fitzgerald; E Jennings
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  A critical review of the topical local anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain.

Authors:  Lisa O'Brien; Anna Taddio; Dorothy A Lyszkiewicz; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  Persistent changes in peripheral and spinal nociceptive processing after early tissue injury.

Authors:  Suellen M Walker; Simon Beggs; Mark L Baccei
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Postnatal tuning of cutaneous inhibitory receptive fields in the rat.

Authors:  Lindsay R Bremner; Maria Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.