Literature DB >> 8157506

Physiological evidence for ipsilateral inhibition in the lateral superior olive: synaptic responses in mouse brain slice.

S H Wu1, J B Kelly.   

Abstract

The incidence of ipsilateral inhibition in the lateral superior olive (LSO) was examined in a brain slice preparation of the mouse superior olivary complex. A 400 microns brain slice was taken in the frontal plane and maintained in a warm, oxygenated saline solution. Intracellular recordings were made from the LSO with micropipettes filled with 4 M potassium acetate. Synaptic responses were elicited by electrical stimulation of the trapezoid body in different slices at various locations between the cochlear nucleus and the ipsilateral superior olivary complex (SOC). The results show that ipsilateral stimulation can evoke inhibitory as well as excitatory postsynaptic potentials. The ipsilateral IPSPs have short latencies and are elicited by stimulation of the trapezoid body at any point along its course between cochlear nucleus and LSO. Short-latency IPSPs can also be produced by direct stimulation of the ventral cochlear nucleus itself. Ipsilateral IPSPs are blocked by low concentrations of the glycine antagonist, strychnine. In addition, bath application of sodium pentobarbital in one case eliminated ipsilateral IPSPs without eliminating EPSPs. The results suggest that there is a rapidly conducting, glycinergic pathway from cochlear nucleus through the trapezoid body to the LSO on the same side of the brain. This pathway is probably served by either a direct projection from the ventral cochlear nucleus to the LSO or an indirect one from cochlear nucleus to LSO through the lateral nucleus of the trapezoid body (LNTB).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8157506     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90282-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Discharge patterns in the lateral superior olive of decerebrate cats.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Kevin A Davis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A model for interaural time difference sensitivity in the medial superior olive: interaction of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs, channel dynamics, and cellular morphology.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Laurel H Carney; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Changes in glycine immunoreactivity in the rat superior olivary complex following deafness.

Authors:  Eric D Buras; Avril Genene Holt; Ronald D Griffith; Mikiya Asako; Richard A Altschuler
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Deafness-related decreases in glycine-immunoreactive labeling in the rat cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Mikiya Asako; Avril G Holt; Ronald D Griffith; Eric D Buras; Richard A Altschuler
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Temporal measures and neural strategies for detection of tones in noise based on responses in anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Transformation of temporal properties between auditory midbrain and cortex in the awake Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  Maria Ter-Mikaelian; Dan H Sanes; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience.

Authors:  Jahn N O'Neil; Catherine J Connelly; Charles J Limb; David K Ryugo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Alteration of glycine receptor immunoreactivity in the auditory brainstem of mice following three months of exposure to radiofrequency radiation at SAR 4.0 W/kg.

Authors:  Dhiraj Maskey; Hyung Gun Kim; Myung-Whan Suh; Gu Seob Roh; Myeung Ju Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.101

9.  Principal cells of the brainstem's interaural sound level detector are temporal differentiators rather than integrators.

Authors:  Tom P Franken; Philip X Joris; Philip H Smith
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.