Literature DB >> 8157235

[Orthodontic materials studied in the HET-CAM test for mucosa-irritating effects].

K U Schendel1, L Erdinger, G Komposch, H G Sonntag.   

Abstract

A total of 33 different substances used in orthodontic therapy were investigated for their potential to irritate mucous membranes. As an alternative to animal testing, the HET-CAM test (Hens Eggs Chorioallantois Membrane Test) was employed. The effects of the substances on the vessels of the chorioallantois membrane, such as haemorrhage, lysis, and coagulation, were videotaped and evaluated. When polymerized correctly in accordance with manufacturers' instructions, plastic materials used for removable orthodontic appliances and bracket bonding caused no irritation. Liquid primers for bracket bonding and monomer substances were highly irritating. Etching gels for decalcification of the enamel surfaces were far less irritating than liquid etching substances. Thus, primers should be handled with care; the use of liquid monomers should be avoided in the oral cavity; and etching gels should be preferred to liquid etching substances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8157235     DOI: 10.1007/bf02175373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  14 in total

1.  [The testing of the toxicity of the plastics used in orthodontics].

Authors:  K U Schendel; M Lenhardt; N E Fusenig; G Komposch
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-10

2.  [DIN-Standard 13930: biological testing of dental materials. II: Application tests. Comparable standards].

Authors:  W T Klötzer; G Schmalz
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1986-12

3.  A guide for the performance of the Chinese hamster ovary cell/hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase gene mutation assay.

Authors:  A P Li; J H Carver; W N Choy; A W Hsie; R S Gupta; K S Loveday; J P O'Neill; J C Riddle; L F Stankowski; L L Yang
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  [Biological properties of composite filling materials].

Authors:  G Schmalz
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1985-09

5.  [Importance of "screening tests" for the biological trial of materials].

Authors:  G Schmalz
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1982-10

6.  [Correlation analyses between cell cultures and animal experiments].

Authors:  G Schmalz
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1982-02

7.  Tissue reaction to orthodontic adhesives.

Authors:  W M Davidson; E M Sheinis; S R Shepherd
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-12

8.  Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential.

Authors:  N P Luepke
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.023

9.  The chick embryo in toxicology: an alternative to the rabbit eye.

Authors:  J Leighton; J Nassauer; R Tchao
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.023

10.  [Toxicity tests of filling materials in the rat implantation test].

Authors:  G Schmalz; H J Bühler
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1983-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Neon-colored plastics for orthodontic appliances. Biocompatibility studies].

Authors:  K U Schendel; L Erdinger; G Komposch; H G Sonntag
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-01

2.  Influence of Test Specimen Geometry and Water Soaking on the In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Orthocryl®, Orthocryl® LC, Loctite® EA 9483 and Polypropylene.

Authors:  Richard Behnke; Franka Stahl; Kathrin Duske; Mareike Warkentin; Margit Schwartz; Burkhard Hinz; Udo Walther
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane.

Authors:  Eric Lutsch; Andreas Struber; Georg Auer; Thomas Fessmann; Günter Lepperdinger
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.523

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.