Literature DB >> 8156696

Knee range of motion in isolated femoral lengthening.

J E Herzenberg1, L L Scheufele, D Paley, R Bechtel, S Tepper.   

Abstract

Twenty-five patients underwent isolated Ilizarov femoral lengthenings (mean lengthening, 6 cm). A retrospective review of the charts showed the specific changes in knee range of motion (ROM) during lengthening, after removal of the frame, and at the final follow-up examination. A decrease in ROM was seen during lengthening to an average minimum of 37 degrees +/- 15 degrees. Toward the end of the consolidation phase, improvement to 69 degrees +/- 28 degrees was noted. A progressive increase in ROM was seen after frame removal. Mean preoperative flexion was 127 degrees +/- 16 degrees, and at follow-up flexion was 122 degrees +/- 23 degrees (p = 0.191). Of the five patients who did not achieve 120 degrees flexion at the final follow-up examination, three had a diminished ROM (average, 107 degrees) at the outset. Two patients lost more than 15% of their preoperative flexion. There was no correlation noted between worst ROM (during lengthening) and final ROM at the last follow-up examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  Precision of the PRECICE internal bone lengthening nail.

Authors:  Yatin M Kirane; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ilizarov's method: a solution for infected bone loss.

Authors:  K Fabry; J Lammens; P Delhey; J Stuyck; U Z Pellenberg
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2005-11-25

3.  Is Botulinum Toxin Type A a Valuable Adjunct During Femoral Lengthening? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Hoon Park; Soowan Shin; Han Sol Shin; Hyun Woo Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Intramedullary motorized nail for equalization of posttraumatic leg length discrepancies].

Authors:  U Lenze; C C Hasler; A H Krieg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Lengthening With External Fixation Is Effective in Congenital Femoral Deficiency.

Authors:  Daniel E Prince; John E Herzenberg; Shawn C Standard; Dror Paley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Correction of post-traumatic lower limb deformities using the Taylor spatial frame.

Authors:  Rudolf Ganger; Christof Radler; Bernhard Speigner; Franz Grill
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Current concepts of leg lengthening.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Andreas H Krieg
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents : an alternative to external fixators?

Authors:  Andreas H Krieg; Bernhard M Speth; Bruce K Foster
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Internal lengthening device for congenital femoral deficiency and fibular hemimelia.

Authors:  Lior Shabtai; Stacy C Specht; Shawn C Standard; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Limited quadricepsplasty for contracture during femoral lengthening.

Authors:  Saurabh Khakharia; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.