Literature DB >> 8156434

Growth and food intake responses to diets of different protein contents and a choice between diets containing two concentrations of protein in broiler and layer strains of chicken.

F Shariatmadari1, J M Forbes.   

Abstract

1. Food intake, protein intake and body weight gain were measured in male broiler and layer strains of chickens offered approximately isocaloric diets containing various concentrations of protein from 4 to 9 weeks of age. The carcases were analysed for protein, fat and ash. 2. In the first experiment 5 birds of each strain were given diets containing either 65, 115, 172, 225 or 280 g protein/kg fresh matter. The sixth group was given a choice between 65 and 280 g/kg. There was an approximately linear increase in protein deposition with dietary protein content up to 280 g/kg with broilers and 225 g/kg with layers. When a choice of diets was offered, birds of both strains grew at a rate not significantly different from that of birds on the diets with the lowest protein content which gave maximal growth given singly, by making an apparently appropriate choice from the two diets. 3. In the second experiment broilers were offered a choice of two diets in the following combinations: 65 and 115, 65 and 225, 115 and 225, 225 and 280 and 280, and 320 g/kg protein. They were able to differentiate successfully between two diets on the basis of their protein content and, where the two diets were on either side of the optimum, to change the proportions selected as they grew to match their changing requirement for dietary protein. When given two diets, both of which had protein contents lower than the single diets which gave maximal growth, birds ate predominantly from that closer to that optimal diet. When both diets had a higher protein content than the optimum birds ate mostly from that closer to optimum. 4. The results show that growing chickens can match their protein intake closely to their requirements when given a pair of diets that allows this; if both diets are on the same side of the optimum then the one closest to that required is predominantly chosen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8156434     DOI: 10.1080/00071669308417656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  9 in total

Review 1.  The detoxification limitation hypothesis: where did it come from and where is it going?

Authors:  Karen J Marsh; Ian R Wallis; Rose L Andrew; William J Foley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Regulation of nutrient intake in nectar-feeding birds: insights from the geometric framework.

Authors:  Angela Köhler; David Raubenheimer; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Inadequate dietary protein increases hunger and desire to eat in younger and older men.

Authors:  John W Apolzan; Nadine S Carnell; Richard D Mattes; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Testing protein leverage in lean humans: a randomised controlled experimental study.

Authors:  Alison K Gosby; Arthur D Conigrave; Namson S Lau; Miguel A Iglesias; Rosemary M Hall; Susan A Jebb; Jennie Brand-Miller; Ian D Caterson; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Constraints on energy intake in fish: the link between diet composition, energy metabolism, and energy intake in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Subramanian Saravanan; Johan W Schrama; A Claudia Figueiredo-Silva; Sadasivam J Kaushik; Johan A J Verreth; Inge Geurden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Chicks change their pecking behaviour towards stationary and mobile food sources over the first 12 weeks of life: improvement and discontinuities.

Authors:  Kenneth J Murphy; Thomas J Hayden; John P Kent
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Phosphorus Supplementation Mitigated Food Intake and Growth of Rats Fed a Low-Protein Diet.

Authors:  Rola U Hammoud; Mark N Jabbour; Ayman N Tawil; Hala Ghattas; Omar A Obeid
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 8.  Macronutrient Determinants of Obesity, Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Health.

Authors:  Jibran A Wali; Samantha M Solon-Biet; Therese Freire; Amanda E Brandon
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

9.  Possible role of available phosphorus in potentiating the use of low-protein diets for broiler chicken production.

Authors:  A J Cowieson; R Perez-Maldonado; A Kumar; M Toghyani
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.