Literature DB >> 8156342

Ultrasonography as a method of measuring breast tumour size and monitoring response to primary systemic treatment.

P Forouhi1, J S Walsh, T J Anderson, U Chetty.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of change in tumour size is a prerequisite for the use of response-based regimens of primary systemic therapy for breast cancer. This study evaluated the accuracy of clinical assessment, mammography and ultrasonography in measuring tumour size and in monitoring response to treatment. Size was determined during the week preceding surgery and actual size measured from resected specimens. Sequential measurements were performed in 35 patients undergoing primary systemic treatment. There was moderate correlation between pathological and clinical size (n = 51, r2 = 0.68, P < 0.0001). Close correlation with pathological tumour size was observed for mammographic (n = 45, r2 = 0.84, P < 0.0001) and ultrasonographic (n = 52, r2 = 0.89, P < 0.0001) tumour size. Response was correctly evaluated by clinical assessment in 31 of 35 patients, by mammography in 20 of 35 and by ultrasonography in 31 of 35. Actual tumour size can be measured accurately by available imaging techniques but ultrasonography is the most practical and accurate method for monitoring response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156342     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Lavinia P Middleton; Aysegul A Sahin; Peter Dempsey; Aman U Buzdar; Attiqa N Mirza; Fredrick C Ames; Gildy V Babiera; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Keune; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman; Abigail Hoffman; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  A comparison of tumour size measurements with palpation, ultrasound and mammography in male breast cancer: first results of the prospective register study.

Authors:  Martin Streng; Atanas Ignatov; Mattea Reinisch; Serban-Dan Costa; Holm Eggemann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Assessment of breast cancer tumour size using six different methods.

Authors:  Martina Meier-Meitinger; Lothar Häberle; Peter A Fasching; Mayada R Bani; Katharina Heusinger; David Wachter; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Uder; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Boris Adamietz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Optical tecnology developments in biomedicine: history, current and future.

Authors:  Shoko Nioka; Yu Chen
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2011-10-17

6.  Ultrasound assessment of residual abnormalities following primary chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  M T Seymour; E C Moskovic; G Walsh; P Trott; I E Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Changes in expression of transforming growth factor beta mRNA isoforms in patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy.

Authors:  J MacCallum; J C Keen; J M Bartlett; A M Thompson; J M Dixon; W R Miller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Concentrations of tamoxifen and its major metabolites in hormone responsive and resistant breast tumours.

Authors:  J MacCallum; J Cummings; J M Dixon; W R Miller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  R J Burcombe; A Makris; P I Richman; F M Daley; S Noble; M Pittam; D Wright; S A Allen; J Dove; G D Wilson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Oestrogen receptor beta and neoadjuvant therapy with tamoxifen: prediction of response and effects of treatment.

Authors:  W R Miller; T J Anderson; J M Dixon; P T K Saunders
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.