Literature DB >> 8156270

Rehydration or dehydration?

B Dicks1.   

Abstract

The ability of medicine to prolong human life through the use of sophisticated technology has raised many ethical questions, notably those related to the issue of withholding or withdrawing nutrition and hydration from certain patients. Health care professionals have begun debating what criteria should be applied when treating patients who are not able to choose for themselves. This review focuses on some of the dilemmas inherent in this issue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156270     DOI: 10.1007/bf00572088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  6 in total

Review 1.  Provision of food and fluids in terminal care: a sociological analysis.

Authors:  F McInerney
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Medical management of intestinal obstruction in patients with advanced malignant disease. A clinical and pathological study.

Authors:  M Baines; D J Oliver; R L Carter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-11-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Whose right is it, anyway?

Authors:  J Andrews
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1989 Nov 22-28

4.  Terminal dehydration.

Authors:  D Oliver
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Ethical issues in caring for the patient with advanced cancer.

Authors:  C Scanlon; C Fleming
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 6.  The negotiation of death: clinical decision making at the end of life.

Authors:  J Slomka
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.634

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Controversies in supportive care: destructive or beneficial diversity?

Authors:  E Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.