Literature DB >> 8156069

Influence of hip position on measurements of the straight leg raise test.

D M Cameron1, R W Bohannon, S V Owen.   

Abstract

Variations of the straight leg raise (SLR) test are described clinically; however, no studies have examined how these variations may affect the outcome of this test. This study examined whether measurements of SLR are influenced by position of contralateral hip (flexed vs. extended), nature of the trial (active vs. passive), or trial repetitions (1 vs. 2). Twenty-two healthy, young subjects participated in this study. A 35-mm camera recorded the position of the pelvis and lower limb during the performance of a right SLR. Passive SLR (opposite hip extended vs. opposite hip flexed) and active SLR (opposite hip extended vs. opposite hip flexed) were performed twice, in random order. Three different measures of SLR were obtained while subjects performed SLR under the aforementioned conditions--SLR relative to horizontal, SLR relative to pelvis, and pelvis relative to horizontal. Differences in SLR between opposite hip flexed vs. extended, passive vs. active, and trials were analyzed using a multifactorial analysis of variance for repeated measures. Hip position affected SLR relative to horizontal (p < .000) and pelvis relative to horizontal (p < .000), with an increase in measurement occurring with the opposite hip flexed. Nature of the trial (active vs. passive) affected SLR to pelvis (p < .003) and pelvis to horizontal (p < .000) with an increase in measurement for passive SLR. A difference in measurements existed between trials 1 and 2 for SLR to horizontal (p < .005) and for SLR to pelvis (p < .005). Although conducted on healthy subjects, the study points out the necessity of consistency of method when performing and interpreting the SLR test.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156069     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.3.168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  5 in total

1.  Reliability and agreement of hip range of motion and provocative physical examination tests in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Devyani M Hunt; Karen Steger-May; Vinta Mathew; John C Clohisy
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Creation and Critique of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Use of the STARD and QUADAS Methodological Quality Assessment Tools.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Joshua Cleland; Peter Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

3.  Effect of dry needling of gluteal muscles on straight leg raise: a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind trial.

Authors:  L Huguenin; P D Brukner; P McCrory; P Smith; H Wajswelner; K Bennell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  A comparison of the sit-and-reach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students.

Authors:  Pedro A López-Miñarro; Pilar Sáinz de Baranda Andújar; Pedro L Rodrñguez-Garcña
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Assessment of the Range of Movement of the Lower Limb in Sport: Advantages of the ROM-SPORT I Battery.

Authors:  Antonio Cejudo; Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Francisco Ayala; Mark De Ste Croix; Fernando Santonja-Medina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.