Literature DB >> 8155226

Comments on the AAMC policy statement recommending strategies for increasing the production of generalist physicians.

D S Greer1, K N Bhak, B M Zenker.   

Abstract

The United States has a physician specialty imbalance, primarily a shortage of generalists (defined as family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians) relative to other specialists. In recent years, the rising costs of health care, the expansion of managed care, and problems of access to care have accentuated the critical role that generalists must play in a cost-effective, accessible health care system. Despite numerous public and private initiatives designed to address the supply of generalist physicians, the ratio of generalists to specialists has been decreasing. Although the factors contributing to the shrinking proportion of generalists are many and are often outside the control of educators, there is evidence that medical schools can play a major role in influencing specialty choice. Recognizing the need to address the specialty imbalance in this country, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) appointed the Generalist Physician Task Force to develop a statement suggesting actions that the AAMC and its constituents could take to foster a greater representation of generalist physicians in the United States. The task force produced an Executive Summary, published as an AAMC policy statement in early 1993, that contained recommended strategies for medical schools, graduate medical education, and the practice environment. The authors of the present article critique these recommendations, provide a background and rationale for each of them, and give suggestions about how some of the recommendations might be implemented. While they are in general agreement with the AAMC policy statement, they feel the recommended strategies fall short of the need. They maintain that the AAMC statement represents an admirable but cautious approach to a daunting problem, and that the time is past when cautious approaches will suffice. The authors conclude with the hope that bolder initiatives will emerge from the new AAMC Office of Generalist Physician Programs.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8155226     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199404000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  The role of curriculum in influencing students to select generalist training: a 21-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  B Stimmel; M Serber
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 2.  Osler's choice: one person's perspective on the past and future of internal medicine.

Authors:  C S Bryan
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2000

3.  Factors associated with choosing a primary care career.

Authors:  J L Schieberl; R M Covell; C Berry; J Anderson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-06

4.  Student loan debt does not predict female physicians' choice of primary care specialty.

Authors:  E Frank; S Feinglass
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Can the specialist be a generalist?

Authors:  M Jacobs
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.