Literature DB >> 8154966

Medicolegal analysis of the delayed diagnosis of cancer in 338 cases in the United States.

K A Kern1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the frequency, clinical characteristics, and legal outcomes of the delayed diagnosis of cancer leading to negligence litigation.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of 338 jury verdict reports from 42 states in the United States.
SETTING: State and federal civil court decisions, as reported to litigation survey services, in a 5-year interval from 1985 to 1990.
RESULTS: Of 338 cancers divided into 13 major organ sites, breast (38%, n = 127), gastrointestinal (15%, n = 51), lung (15%, n = 50), and head and neck cancers (10%, n = 33) accounted for 80% (270/338) of lawsuits. The average diagnostic delay for 212 cases was 17 months. The median age of patients with delays was 15 years younger than the age of patients presenting with cancer in the general population. For cancers in nine major organ sites, the ratio of mortality for patients filing lawsuits to that for patients with cancer in the general population averaged 3.4:1. The total known indemnity payout was $140.2 million, with an average payout per case of $64,600. At 1 to 3 months of diagnostic delay, jury verdicts largely favored the defense (seven of 11 [65%] defense verdicts); after 6 months of delay, jury verdicts were almost evenly divided between defense verdicts, plaintiff verdicts, and out-of-court settlements.
CONCLUSIONS: The delayed diagnosis of cancer leading to negligence litigation is associated with significant indemnity payments, often involves middle-aged patients far younger than the expected age in the general cancer population, and is defensible only in the minority after 6 months of diagnostic delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8154966     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280073009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  12 in total

1.  Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Kamal Hirani; Himabindu Kadiyala; Olga Rudomiotov; Traber Davis; Myrna M Khan; Terry L Wahls
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Clinical demand for chest/abdomen/pelvis anatomy following thoracic or lumbar spine CT.

Authors:  Tiffany M Newman; Matthew D Cham; Honglei Zhang; Keith D Hentel; Kevin Mennitt; Linda Heier; Martin R Prince
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28

3.  Effect of delays on survival in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Francisco Javier González-Barcala; José María García-Prim; José Manuel Alvarez-Dobaño; Milagros Moldes-Rodríguez; María Teresa García-Sanz; Antonio Pose-Reino; Luis Valdés-Cuadrado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  The effect of age on delay in diagnosis and stage of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-05-03

6.  Delays in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  J S Billing; F C Wells
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Can early diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer improve the prognosis?

Authors:  Fernando Gonzalez-Hermoso; Julian Perez-Palma; Joaquin Marchena-Gomez; Nieves Lorenzo-Rocha; Vincente Medina-Arana
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening.

Authors:  L E M Duijm; J H Groenewoud; F H Jansen; J Fracheboud; M van Beek; H J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The influence on survival of delay in the presentation and treatment of symptomatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M A Richards; P Smith; A J Ramirez; I S Fentiman; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  How do nurses and teachers perform breast self-examination: are they reliable sources of information?

Authors:  Fatma Demirkiran; Nevin Akdolun Balkaya; Sakine Memis; Gulengun Turk; Safiye Ozvurmaz; Pars Tuncyurek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.