Literature DB >> 8154954

Relationship of advance directives to physician-patient communication.

J Virmani1, L J Schneiderman, R M Kaplan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although advance medical directives, such as living wills and durable powers of attorney for health care, are by themselves imperfect instruments for expressing patients' treatment preferences, a possible benefit of these documents is that they will enhance patient-physician communication, especially when end-of-life treatment decisions have to be made.
METHOD: Structured interviews were completed for 115 seriously ill cancer patients and 22 of their physicians. The questions dealt with various aspects of advance directives, including communications between the two parties regarding general and specific treatment wishes. Responses were compared in 37 physician-patient pairs for patients who had executed advance directives and in 31 physician-patient pairs for patients who had not executed advance directives.
RESULTS: Physicians were frequently unaware of their patients' advance directives. Although patients with advance directives were marginally more likely than patients without advance directives to report discussions about end-of-life treatment decisions, only 34 (30%) out of the total of 115 patients claimed that they had any discussion of treatment decisions with their physicians. Such discussions tended to be about general life attitudes and feelings rather than specific treatments, such as use of artificial nutrition or ventilation.
CONCLUSION: Despite public enthusiasm for the use of advance directives and great efforts to promote them, we found little evidence that these documents are associated with enhanced communication between patients and physicians about end-of-life treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; San Diego

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8154954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Advance directives in clinical practice].

Authors:  J Vollmann; I Knöchel-Schiffer
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-07-15

2.  Failure of the Current Advance Care Planning Paradigm: Advocating for a Communications-Based Approach.

Authors:  Laura Vearrier
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-12

3.  Practical methods to increase use of advance medical directives.

Authors:  J B Brown; A Beck; M Boles; P Barrett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Advance directives in the UK: legal, ethical, and practical considerations for doctors.

Authors:  A S Kessel; J Meran
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  An analysis of "dignity".

Authors:  P R Johnson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-08

6.  "Allow Natural Death" versus "Do Not Resuscitate": What Do Patients with Advanced Cancer Choose?

Authors:  Miloš D Miljković; Dennis Emuron; Lori Rhodes; Joseph Abraham; Kenneth Miller
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Preferences of physicians and their patients for end-of-life care.

Authors:  G P Gramelspacher; X H Zhou; M P Hanna; W M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  End-of-life treatment in managed care. The potential and the peril.

Authors:  S H Miles; E P Weber; R Koepp
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-09

9.  Making an advance directive.

Authors:  G S Robertson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

10.  Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives.

Authors:  G S Fischer; J A Tulsky; M R Rose; L A Siminoff; R M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.