Literature DB >> 8153246

Conflict between aftereffects of retinal sweep and looming motion.

B Bridgeman1, C Nardello.   

Abstract

Observers looked monocularly into a tunnel, with gratings on the left and right sides drifting toward the head. An exposure period was followed by a test with fixed gratings. With fixation points, left and right retinal fields could be stimulated selectively. When exposure and test were on the same retinal fields, but fixation was on opposite sides of the tunnel during exposure and test periods, aftereffects of retinal sweep and of perceived looming were in opposite directions. The two effects tended to cancel, yielding no perceived aftereffect. When they did occur, aftereffects in the retinal and the looming directions were equally likely. Cancellation was significantly more likely in the experimental conditions than in the control, when fixation always remained on the same side. When areas of retinal stimulation in the exposure and test periods did not overlap, cancellation was less frequent and aftereffects of looming were more frequent. Results were not significantly different for left and right visual fields, indicating that cortical vs. subcortical OKN pathways do not influence the illusion. Vection resulted for 16 of 20 observers under one or another of our conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8153246     DOI: 10.1007/bf00419714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  6 in total

1.  EVIDENCE FOR A PHYSIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION OF THE WATERFALL PHENOMENON AND FIGURAL AFTER-EFFECTS.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R M HILL
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Interocular transfer of after-images?

Authors:  G L WALLS
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1953-02

3.  Motion aftereffects and retinal motion.

Authors:  A Mack; J Hill; S Kahn
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Motion habituation: inverted self-motion perception and optokinetic after-nystagmus.

Authors:  T Brandt; J Dichgans; W Büchle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: different neural mechanisms?

Authors:  K I Beverley; D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Illusory motion in depth: aftereffect of adaptation to changing size.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Parallax-sensitive remapping of visual space in occipito-parietal alpha-band activity during whole-body motion.

Authors:  T P Gutteling; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Early vestibular processing does not discriminate active from passive self-motion if there is a discrepancy between predicted and actual proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.