Literature DB >> 8151903

Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure based on left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction.

W H Gaasch1.   

Abstract

Data from large and small clinical trials reflect major differences in the pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction. These studies also indicate that medical therapy can benefit patients with LV dysfunction regardless of whether or not they are symptomatic. Because the descriptive term congestive heart failure does not provide for these important distinctions, a new classification of LV dysfunction has been developed in which patients with LV dysfunction are categorized on the basis of normal or abnormal systolic function. This classification is based on a simple assessment of LV function, it is applicable to patients without symptoms, and it reflects differences in treatment and prognosis. Those with clinically significant LV systolic dysfunction (ie, an LV ejection fraction < 40%) benefit from therapy whether or not they have symptoms of heart failure. Those with LV dysfunction and a normal LV ejection fraction (ie, diastolic dysfunction) also benefit from medical therapy. Annual mortality is higher in those with systolic dysfunction than in those with diastolic dysfunction, but within each of these categories mortality is higher in those with symptoms than in those without. This classification can be useful in the diagnosis and treatment of individual patients as well as in epidemiologic surveys designed to assess medical practice patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8151903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  29 in total

1.  Diastolic Heart Failure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-10

2.  Classification of heart failure in population based research: an assessment of six heart failure scores.

Authors:  A Mosterd; J W Deckers; A W Hoes; A Nederpel; A Smeets; D T Linker; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Echocardiographic monitoring of patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Amra Macić-Dzanković; Fuad Dzanković; Belma Pojskić; Amira Skopljak
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Recapitulating maladaptive, multiscale remodeling of failing myocardium on a chip.

Authors:  Megan L McCain; Sean P Sheehy; Anna Grosberg; Josue A Goss; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Therapeutic approaches to diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Rajesh Janardhanan; Akshay S Desai; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Choosing antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  D A Katzman; B Littenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm.

Authors:  William B Hood; Antonio L Dans; Gordon H Guyatt; Roman Jaeschke; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-28

Review 8.  Antihypertensive drugs and the heart.

Authors:  Joseph A Diamond; Robert A Phillips
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Prevalence of suspected diastolic dysfunction in patients with a clinical diagnosis of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Movahed; Mastaneh Ahmadi-Kashani; Yuji Saito
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 10.  Diastolic function in hypertension.

Authors:  R A Phillips; J A Diamond
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.