Literature DB >> 8150510

The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study.

W Becker1, C Dahlin, B E Becker, U Lekholm, D van Steenberghe, K Higuchi, C Kultje.   

Abstract

This multicenter study was conducted to determine the predictability for implants placed into immediate extraction sockets and augmented with e-PTFE barrier membranes. Forty-nine implants were placed in immediate extraction sockets. Initial and final defect measurements and the number of threads exposed were compared. Patients were followed up to 1 year after implant loading. Three implants were lost at the abutment connection surgery. The 1-year survival rate was 93.9%. Twenty barrier membranes became exposed and were removed prior to stage 2 surgery, while the remaining barriers were removed at abutment connection. The average defect bone formation for membrane-retained sites was 4.8 mm, while the average bone formation for sites in which the membranes were prematurely removed was 4.0 mm (P < .0001). At stage 2 surgery there was an average of 0.6 threads exposed (P < .001) for the membrane-retained sites and 2.6 threads for the early removal sites (NS). Forty-five pairs of nonstandardized radiographs were evaluated for bone loss after implant loading (average 7.5 months). The mesiodistal bone loss averaged 0.72 mm. Within the limits of this study, e-PTFE membranes will promote clinically and statistically significant amounts of bone around immediately placed implants. Retention of e-PTFE barriers until stage 2 surgery improves the amount of bone promoted around the implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8150510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  24 in total

1.  New technique for inter-implant papilla reconstruction between two or more implants in patients with variably reabsorbed ridges and flat anatomy. Preliminary results of a 9 consecutive clinical case series.

Authors:  R Tizzoni; M Tizzoni
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-19

Review 2.  Immobilized liquid layers: A new approach to anti-adhesion surfaces for medical applications.

Authors:  Irini Sotiri; Jonathan C Overton; Anna Waterhouse; Caitlin Howell
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-03-27

Review 3.  Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Javairia Qureshi; Abdullah M Alshahrani; Heba Nassar; Yuichi Ikeda; Michael Glogauer; Bernhard Ganss
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Comparison of Anchorage Pattern under Two Types of Orthodontic Mini- Implant Loading During Retraction in Type A Anchorage Cases.

Authors:  B Imran Khan; Gowri Sankar Singaraju; Prasad Mandava; G Vivek Reddy; Venkatesh Nettam; Venkat Naidu Bhavikati
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

5.  Proteomic analysis of gingival tissue and alveolar bone during alveolar bone healing.

Authors:  Hee-Young Yang; Joseph Kwon; Min-Suk Kook; Seong Soo Kang; Se Eun Kim; Sungoh Sohn; Seunggon Jung; Sang-Oh Kwon; Hyung-Seok Kim; Jae Hyuk Lee; Tae-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Plain and drug loaded polyphosphazene membranes and microspheres in the treatment of rabbit bone defects.

Authors:  P Passi; A Zadro; F Marsilio; S Lora; P Caliceti; F M Veronese
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: a review.

Authors:  Jie Liu; David G Kerns
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-05-16

8.  Comparison of immediate complete denture, tooth and implant-supported overdenture on vertical dimension and muscle activity.

Authors:  Farhan Khalid Shah; Ashraf Gebreel; Ali Hamed Elshokouki; Ahmed Ali Habib; Amit Porwal
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 9.  Post extractive implant: evaluation of the critical aspects.

Authors:  L Tettamanti; C Andrisani; M Andreasi Bassi; R Vinci; J Silvestre-Rangil; A Tagliabue
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-09-27

10.  Is The Periapical lesion a Risk For Periimplantitis? (A review).

Authors:  Z Rezaei Esfahrood; M Kadkhodazadeh; R Amid; Ar Rokn
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.