Literature DB >> 8149843

Correlation of lower esophageal mucosal ring and lower esophageal sphincter pressure.

M Y Chen1, D J Ott, D L Donati, W C Wu, D W Gelfand.   

Abstract

We assessed the relationship of lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) to presence and absence of lower esophageal mucosal ring (LEMR) in 66 patients to determine if the LEMR was more likely related to prolonged sphincter hypotension. This potential relationship is of interest because LEMR may be due to reflux esophagitis. Each patient had radiographic and manometric studies, and both examinations were done within one week of each other. The mean LESP in patients with LEMR was 23.8 mm Hg (range 4.2-64 mm Hg) compared to 28.7 mm Hg (range 8-59 mm Hg) in patients without LEMR; the difference was not statistically significant. Patients with LEMR were also divided into three subgroups according to the diameter of the rings (< or = 13 mm, 14-19 mm, > or = 20 mm). There was no significant relationship between the caliber of LEMR and LESP (P > 0.05). Presence of LEMR did not affect the amplitude or duration of primary esophageal peristalsis. These results do not support a relationship between LEMR and prolonged LESP hypotension or abnormal esophageal motility. However, other pathogenetic mechanisms involved in producing reflux esophagitis not related to prolonged sphincter hypotension were not studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8149843     DOI: 10.1007/bf02087421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  Endoscopic signs for gastroesophageal reflux objectively evaluated.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R DeMeester; R C Haggitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Analysis of thirty-two patients with Schatzki's ring.

Authors:  J Jamieson; R A Hinder; T R DeMeester; D Litchfield; A Barlow; R T Bailey
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Relationship of hiatal hernia to endoscopically proved reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  R A Wright; A L Hurwitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Does hiatus hernia affect competence of the gastroesophageal sphincter?

Authors:  S Cohen; L D Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The esophagogastric junction in patients with asymptomatic lower esophageal mucosal rings.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; B Adami; H Hücker; H Leeder
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Gastroesophageal reflux as a pathogenic factor in the development of symptomatic lower esophageal rings.

Authors:  J B Marshall; J M Kretschmar; A A Diaz-Arias
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-08

7.  Predictive relationship of hiatal hernia to reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; Y M Chen; W C Wu; H A Munitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985

8.  Natural progression of the lower esophageal mucosal ring.

Authors:  Y M Chen; D W Gelfand; D J Ott; H A Munitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

9.  Reflux esophagitis revisited: prospective analysis of radiologic accuracy.

Authors:  D J Ott; W C Wu; D W Gelfand
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1981-01-15

10.  Multiphasic examination of the esophagogastric region for strictures, rings, and hiatal hernia: evaluation of the individual techniques.

Authors:  Y M Chen; D J Ott; D W Gelfand; H A Munitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.