Literature DB >> 8149809

The three-dimensional structure of the central region in a synaptonemal complex: a comparison between rat and two insect species, Drosophila melanogaster and Blaps cribrosa.

K Schmekel1, U Skoglund, B Daneholt.   

Abstract

The highly ordered central region of the synaptonemal complex (SC) in Blaps cribrosa has recently been studied by electron microscope tomography (EMT), and a simple three-dimensional model presented. Using the same experimental approach we have now compared the central region in Blaps with the central regions in Drosophila melanogaster and rat. In all three species, the SCs exhibit a central element (CE) flanked by two lateral elements (LEs). The central region between the two LEs is crossed by transverse filaments (TFs). The Blaps CE element is the most ordered one with a well-defined ladder-like structure with two longitudinal components bridged by a number of regularly spaced transverse components, the rungs of the ladder. At the junctions between the longitudinal and transverse components there are prominent dense structures. The CE is multi-layered with the ladders of the separate layers in approximate register. In Drosophila the transverse CE components are as distinct and well organized as in Blaps, while in rat they are present but are less frequent and less well ordered. The longitudinal CE components in Drosophila are often fragmented and even more so in rat. The tomographic analysis revealed that in all three species the central region contains the same structural units: a single TF associated with two short pillars (or globules), which correspond to the junction structures. A fibrous lattice connects the two pillars/globules on the same TF forming the transverse CE component and those on adjacent TFs forming the longitudinal CE component; fibers between pillars/globules also link consecutive CE layers together. In the longitudinal component the number of fibrous bridges between the pillars/globules is related to the conspicuousness of the longitudinal component, i.e. Blaps has most, Drosophila almost as many, and rat considerably fewer bridges. We conclude that the central region in rat, Drosophila and Blaps contains the same basic structural unit but the degree of order and concentration of the units differ: a higher density seems to be accompanied by a higher order within the CE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8149809     DOI: 10.1007/bf00650894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  15 in total

1.  The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation.

Authors:  D von Wettstein; S W Rasmussen; P B Holm
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Fine structure of meiotic chromosomes. Comparative study of nine species of insects.

Authors:  J R Sotelo; R Wettstein
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Ultrastructure and composition of the synaptonemal complex in spread and negatively stained spermatocytes of the golden hamster and the albino rat.

Authors:  A J Solari
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  The attachment of the synaptonemal complex to the nuclear envelope. An ultrastructural and cytochemical analysis.

Authors:  P Esponda; G Giménez-Martín
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The central region of the synaptonemal complex in Blaps cribrosa studied by electron microscope tomography.

Authors:  K Schmekel; J Wahrman; U Skoglund; B Daneholt
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. I. Structure, arrangement, and temporal change of the synaptonemal complex in wild-type.

Authors:  A T Carpenter
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  The meotic prophase in Bombyx mori females analyzed by three dimensional reconstructions of synaptonemal complexes.

Authors:  S W Rasmussen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-02-23       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Heterochromatin, the synaptonemal complex and crossing over.

Authors:  S M Stack
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Multiple core complexes in grasshopper spermatocytes and spermatids.

Authors:  P B Moens
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The structure of the central region in the synaptonemal complexes of hamster and cricket spermatocytes.

Authors:  A J Solari; M J Moses
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  19 in total

1.  Juxtaposition of C(2)M and the transverse filament protein C(3)G within the central region of Drosophila synaptonemal complex.

Authors:  Lorinda K Anderson; Suzanne M Royer; Scott L Page; Kim S McKim; Ann Lai; Mary A Lilly; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Application of advanced fluorescence microscopy to the structure of meiotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Peter M Carlton
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-04-13

3.  Identification of a meiosis-specific protein as a member of the class of cancer/testis antigens.

Authors:  O Türeci; U Sahin; C Zwick; M Koslowski; G Seitz; M Pfreundschuh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The central region of the synaptonemal complex in Blaps cribrosa studied by electron microscope tomography.

Authors:  K Schmekel; J Wahrman; U Skoglund; B Daneholt
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Structural basis of meiotic chromosome synapsis through SYCP1 self-assembly.

Authors:  James M Dunce; Orla M Dunne; Matthew Ratcliff; Claudia Millán; Suzanne Madgwick; Isabel Usón; Owen R Davies
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Organization of the synaptonemal complex during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Kristina Schild-Prüfert; Takamune T Saito; Sarit Smolikov; Yanjie Gu; Marina Hincapie; David E Hill; Marc Vidal; Kent McDonald; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Meiotic chromosome morphology and behavior in zip1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K S Tung; G S Roeder
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Superresolution expansion microscopy reveals the three-dimensional organization of the Drosophila synaptonemal complex.

Authors:  Cori K Cahoon; Zulin Yu; Yongfu Wang; Fengli Guo; Jay R Unruh; Brian D Slaughter; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Synaptonemal complex assembly and H3K4Me3 demethylation determine DIDO3 localization in meiosis.

Authors:  Ignacio Prieto; Anna Kouznetsova; Agnes Fütterer; Varvara Trachana; Esther Leonardo; Astrid Alonso Guerrero; Mercedes Cano Gamero; Cristina Pacios-Bras; Hervé Leh; Malcolm Buckle; Mónica Garcia-Gallo; Leonor Kremer; Antonio Serrano; Fernando Roncal; Juan Pablo Albar; José Luis Barbero; Carlos Martínez-A; Karel H M van Wely
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Structural analysis of the human SYCE2-TEX12 complex provides molecular insights into synaptonemal complex assembly.

Authors:  Owen R Davies; Joseph D Maman; Luca Pellegrini
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.