Literature DB >> 8148291

Subarachnoid morphine and fentanyl for labor analgesia. Efficacy and adverse effects.

L E Caldwell1, M A Rosen, S M Shnider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to compare analgesic efficacy and associated adverse effects between a group of parturients receiving subarachnoid opioids via the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique with a group receiving epidural analgesia alone for labor.
METHODS: The authors studied 59 healthy parturients admitted for labor and delivery. Group 1 consisted of 26 consecutive patients who received the CSE technique, initially receiving subarachnoid morphine sulfate 0.25 mg, and fentanyl 25 micrograms, for labor analgesia. If patients requested additional analgesia, epidural analgesia was initiated. Group 2 was comprised of 33 consecutive patients who received conventional epidural analgesia. All patients were monitored for the occurrence and treatment of peripartum nausea and vomiting (N/V), pruritus, postdural puncture headache, and respiratory depression.
RESULTS: Additional analgesia was requested by 20/26 (76%) patients in group 1. Group 1 reported more N/V (50% versus 15%, P = .01) and required more therapy for N/V (31% versus 0%, P < .01) than group 2. Furthermore, group 1 reported having more pruritus (50% versus 3%, P < .01), and required more treatment for pruritus (35% versus 3%, P < .01), than group 2. No patient developed significant respiratory depression. Only one patient in group 1 developed a postdural puncture headache, following unintentional dural puncture with the 18 gauge Tuohy needle.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of subarachnoid morphine 0.25 mg and fentanyl 25 micrograms, when used for labor analgesia as part of the CSE technique, was associated with a higher incidence of clinically significant nausea and vomiting and pruritus, compared to conventional epidural anesthesia. Furthermore, the combination of subarachnoid morphine and fentanyl proved ineffective in providing adequate pain relief for the duration of labor and delivery for the majority of patients. The authors recommend that subarachnoid morphine and fentanyl serve a limited role in the treatment of labor pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8148291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth        ISSN: 0146-521X


  7 in total

1.  Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses (PIEB) for Maintenance of Labor Analgesia: An Incremental Step Before the Next Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  Brendan Carvalho; Edward T Riley
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

Review 2.  Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Neda Taghizadeh; Alicia T Dennis; Damien Hughes; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 3.  Recent developments in analgesia during labour.

Authors:  R E Kan; S C Hughes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Intraspinal narcotics for obstetric analgesia.

Authors:  S C Hughes
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-01

5.  [The clinical use of spinal opioids, part 1].

Authors:  N Rawal
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in advanced labour.

Authors:  A Abouleish; E Abouleish; W Camann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Lower, Variable Intrathecal Opioid Doses, and the Incidence of Prolonged Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations After Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia for Labor: A Quality Improvement Analysis.

Authors:  Sheena Hembrador; Carlos Delgado; Emily Dinges; Laurent Bollag
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.