Literature DB >> 8148107

Comparative effects of fluoxetine, amitriptyline and serotonin on functional motor recovery after sensorimotor cortex injury.

M G Boyeson1, R L Harmon, J L Jones.   

Abstract

A recent investigation of the effects of the antidepressants desipramine and trazodone on behavioral recovery in brain-injured animals suggested that antidepressants, which act to increase noradrenergic activity in the brain, may facilitate the rate of recovery, whereas those that act to increase serotonergic (5-HT) activity may hinder recovery and reinstate deficits in recovered animals. The present study was designed to evaluate these findings further by assessing the effect of a single intraperitoneal injection of fluoxetine (a relatively pure 5-HT reuptake blocker), amitriptyline (a mixed 5-HT and noradrenergic reuptake blocker with alpha 1-adrenergic receptor blocking activity) or a single intraventricular infusion of 5-HT on recovery of beam-walking ability in animals with a unilateral sensorimotor cortex injury. None of the drugs significantly affected the rate of recovery. Although fluoxetine was ineffective in reinstating the motor deficit in recovered animals, amitriptyline reinstated the deficit in a dose-dependent fashion. Infusion of 5-HT resulted in an extremely transient reinstatement of the deficit, which was largely attributable to its short-term sedative properties. These results suggest that 5-HT may be less involved in functional recovery than previously thought. They also add further support to previous findings that indicate that drugs which act to antagonize alpha 1-adrenergic activity (e.g., phenoxybenzamine) may interfere with motor recovery after sensorimotor cortex injury. An appreciation of the potential impact of certain antidepressants on functional recovery in brain-injured patients appears warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8148107     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199404000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  7 in total

1.  No effects of enhanced central norepinephrine on finger-sequence learning and attention.

Authors:  Christian Plewnia; Julia Hoppe; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Emerging treatments for motor rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Edward S Claflin; Chandramouli Krishnan; Sandeep P Khot
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-04

3.  Fluoxetine increases hippocampal neurogenesis and induces epigenetic factors but does not improve functional recovery after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Yonggang Wang; Melanie Neumann; Katharina Hansen; Shuwhey M Hong; Sharon Kim; Linda J Noble-Haeusslein; Jialing Liu
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Acute treatment with the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT and chronic environmental enrichment confer neurobehavioral benefit after experimental brain trauma.

Authors:  Anthony E Kline; Amy K Wagner; Brian P Westergom; Rebecca R Malena; Ross D Zafonte; Adam S Olsen; Christopher N Sozda; Pallavi Luthra; Monisha Panda; Jeffery P Cheng; Haris A Aslam
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Voluntary exercise or amphetamine treatment, but not the combination, increases hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor and synapsin I following cortical contusion injury in rats.

Authors:  G S Griesbach; D A Hovda; F Gomez-Pinilla; R L Sutton
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Biological approaches to aphasia treatment.

Authors:  Steven L Small; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 7.  Drugs for stroke recovery: the example of amphetamines.

Authors:  Louise Martinsson; Staffan Eksborg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.