Literature DB >> 8147568

The role of flow cytometry in the diagnosis of lymphoma: a critical analysis.

E E Morse1, H T Yamase, B R Greenberg, J Sporn, S A Harshaw, T R Kiraly, R A Ziemba, M A Fallon.   

Abstract

Flow cytometry, now used routinely to aid in the classification of leukemias, is increasingly being evaluated as a rapid technique for determination of surface antigens on the cells teased from lymph nodes and other masses with suspected lymphoma. The present study reviews biopsy specimens from patients examined during a two year period which were sent for flow cytometry with a diagnosis of suspected lymphoma. Sixteen of 25 samples (64 percent) produced cell suspensions of sufficient quantity and quality to be diagnostically helpful. Results showed that in 9/16 (56 percent) the diagnosis of lymphoma or cancer could be suspected by flow cytometry alone, while 4/16 were consistent with the final tissue diagnosis of normal or reactive hyperplasia. Three samples that came from patients who had morphologic evidence of malignant disease on biopsy (two Hodgkin's disease and one large cell lymphoma) had flow cytometry results that were interpreted as normal. Flow cytometry is rapid and appears to be virtually diagnostic of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma when a majority of cells are B cells with an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio (> 4.0 or < 0.25). Nonhematologic malignancy can be suspected if less than 75 percent of the cells show CD45 (common leukocyte antigen). Hodgkin's disease cannot be detected by flow cytometry as it is currently used, and as many as 15 percent (1/6 in this study) of lymphomas may show normal results. It is extremely helpful when the biopsy sample actually contains the cells of interest in large proportion. Loss of architectural relationships in the course of processing specimens for flow cytometry is a major disadvantage when small foci of lymphoma or tumor cells exist together with large amounts of stroma or normal lymphocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8147568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 0091-7370            Impact factor:   1.256


  7 in total

1.  Applied Protein and Molecular Techniques for Characterization of B Cell Neoplasms in Horses.

Authors:  Peres R Badial; Rebecca L Tallmadge; Steven Miller; Tracy Stokol; Kristy Richards; Alexandre S Borges; M Julia B Felippe
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-08-26

2.  Immunophenotypic profiles for distinguishing orbital mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma from benign lymphoproliferative tumors.

Authors:  Shunichiro Ueda; Yoshihiko Usui; Takeshi Nagai; Daniel Diaz-Aguilar; Toshitaka Nagao; Hiroshi Goto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Malignant small round cell tumors.

Authors:  Arvind Rajwanshi; Radhika Srinivas; Gautam Upasana
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Inconclusive flow cytometric surface light chain results; can cytoplasmic light chains, Bcl-2 expression and PCR clonality analysis improve accuracy of cytological diagnoses in B-cell lymphomas?

Authors:  Andreja Brozic; Ziva Pohar Marinsek; Srdjan Novakovic; Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  A Clinically Applicable Approach to the Classification of B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas with Flow Cytometry and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Valentina Gaidano; Valerio Tenace; Nathalie Santoro; Silvia Varvello; Alessandro Cignetti; Giuseppina Prato; Giuseppe Saglio; Giovanni De Rosa; Massimo Geuna
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Flow cytometric immunophenotyping (FCI) of lymphoma: correlation with histopathology and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Abeer M El-Sayed; Mohammad H El-Borai; Abeer A Bahnassy; Shadia M S El-Gerzawi
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Primary ovarian non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Diagnosis of two cases on fine needle aspiration cytology.

Authors:  Rajni Yadav; Partheeban Balasundaram; Asit R Mridha; Venkateswaran K Iyer; Sandeep R Mathur
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.091

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.