Literature DB >> 8147333

Comparative study of the acute effects of resistant starch and dietary fibers on metabolic indexes in men.

S Ranganathan1, M Champ, C Pechard, P Blanchard, M Nguyen, P Colonna, M Krempf.   

Abstract

The effect of ingestion of the same amount (30 g) of a resistant starch (lintner) and cellulose on energy expenditure (EE), colonic fermentation (breath-hydrogen test), and blood glucose, insulin, and free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations were compared in seven healthy volunteers in a first experiment. In a second experiment the same indexes were measured in six healthy volunteers after the ingestion of diets composed of 50 g glucose alone or mixed with 30 g lintner, or cellulose, or pectin. In the first experiment no differences between lintner and cellulose were observed on the measured indexes. The notable difference was the increased apparent colonic fermentation with lintner after 6 h. In experiment 2, although insulin response was significantly lower in the pectin-added diet, the results obtained with the four different diets were not significantly different. The metabolic characteristics of lintner were closer to cellulose than to pectin. In conclusion, the acute effect of the ingestion of a resistant starch (lintner) on the measured metabolic indexes is similar to that of a known insoluble fiber--cellulose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8147333     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/59.4.879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  8 in total

1.  Effect of resistant starch on potential biomarkers for colonic cancer risk in patients with colonic adenomas: a controlled trial.

Authors:  M J Grubben; C C van den Braak; M Essenberg; M Olthof; A Tangerman; M B Katan; F M Nagengast
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Resistant starch and energy balance: impact on weight loss and maintenance.

Authors:  Janine A Higgins
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.176

Review 3.  Resistant starch: promise for improving human health.

Authors:  Diane F Birt; Terri Boylston; Suzanne Hendrich; Jay-Lin Jane; James Hollis; Li Li; John McClelland; Samuel Moore; Gregory J Phillips; Matthew Rowling; Kevin Schalinske; M Paul Scott; Elizabeth M Whitley
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Resistant starch consumption promotes lipid oxidation.

Authors:  Janine A Higgins; Dana R Higbee; William T Donahoo; Ian L Brown; Melanie L Bell; Daniel H Bessesen
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 5.  Performance Enhancing Diets and the PRISE Protocol to Optimize Athletic Performance.

Authors:  Paul J Arciero; Vincent J Miller; Emery Ward
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  Resistant starch and protein intake enhances fat oxidation and feelings of fullness in lean and overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Christopher L Gentile; Emery Ward; Jens Juul Holst; Arne Astrup; Michael J Ormsbee; Scott Connelly; Paul J Arciero
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Lower Postprandial Thermogenic Response to an Unprocessed Whole Food Meal Compared to an Iso-Energetic/Macronutrient Meal Replacement in Young Women: A Single-Blind Randomized Cross-Over Trial.

Authors:  Alex E Mohr; Carmen Ramos; Kelvin Tavarez; Paul J Arciero
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  A Gluten-Free Meal Produces a Lower Postprandial Thermogenic Response Compared to an Iso-Energetic/Macronutrient Whole Food or Processed Food Meal in Young Women: A Single-Blind Randomized Cross-Over Trial.

Authors:  Brittney Dioneda; Margaret Healy; Maia Paul; Caitlin Sheridan; Alex E Mohr; Paul J Arciero
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.