Literature DB >> 8147300

Ventricular fibrillation induced by low-energy shocks from programmable implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease.

M R Lauer1, C Young, L B Liem, L Ottoboni, J Peterson, P Goold, R J Sung.   

Abstract

Many of the newest implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) provide the option of programmable low-energy cardioversion for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Whereas these devices may provide less myocardial damage and increased comfort in patients receiving frequent shocks for VT, the proarrhythmic effects of low-energy cardioversion from ICDs in patients with structural heart disease are not clear. The purpose of this study was to determine prospectively the per-patient incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction after low-energy cardioversion of VT by ICDs in patients with coronary artery disease. The estimated cardioversion energy requirement was determined during the course of routine predischarge ICD testing in 40 patients with newly implanted ICDs. Two groups of patients were identified during determination of the cardioversion energy requirement: (1) a non-VF group consisting of 26 of 40 patients (65%) without VF induced by low-energy shock and, (2) a VF group consisting of 14 of 40 patients (35%) who developed VF during low-energy cardioversion. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of patient age, sex, concurrent antiarrhythmic drug therapy, VT cycle length, or type of ICD system implanted. Compared with the non-VF group, the VF group was more likely to have both a lower ejection fraction (25 +/- 5% vs 33 +/- 8%; p = 0.005) and a cardioversion energy requirement > 2 J (79 vs 27%; p = 0.005). Our results suggest that low-energy cardioversion is associated with a high per-patient risk of VF induction, and the risk is higher in patients with poorer left ventricular function and, possibly, higher cardioversion energy requirement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8147300     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90333-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Must we always follow the instructions of automated external defibrillators?

Authors:  Nicolas Paleiron; Anne Pegorie; Ba Vinh Nguyen; Christophe Giacardi; Diane Commandeur; Marc Danguy des Déserts; Medhi Ould-Ahmed
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Ventricular fibrillation induced by high-output ICD shock: report of cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Adil Sattar; Shmuel Inbar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-13

3.  [Redetection of tachycardia in severe ventricular undersensing].

Authors:  Jan Steffel
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-07-26

4.  Ventricular tachycardia initiated by high energy cardioversion in a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  M Chinushi; Y Aizawa; K Higuchi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Induction of tachycardia confined within a pulmonary vein by electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Is it proof of reentry?

Authors:  Mauro Toniolo; Jorge Figueroa; Sergio Castrejòn-Castrejòn; Jose Luis Merino
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-02

6.  Automatic adjustment of ventricular antitachycardia pacing and individualized device therapy.

Authors:  Rajiv Tripathi; Christopher Gubran; Craig Jeavons
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-06

7.  "Atrial torsades de pointes" Induced by Low-Energy Shock From Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator.

Authors:  Ilknur Can; Venkatakrishna Tholakanahalli
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2013-09-01

8.  Low-energy cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia: When less is more.

Authors:  Haran Burri; Francesco Moretti; Philippe Meyer
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-02-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.