Literature DB >> 8144823

A longitudinal study of risk factors associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in nursing homes.

G H Brandeis1, W L Ooi, M Hossain, J N Morris, L A Lipsitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors associated with the formation of stage II-IV pressure ulcers in nursing homes.
DESIGN: Since the incidence rate for pressure ulcer formation varies among nursing homes, the homes were divided into tertiles based on these rates. Pooled logistic regression was used to model which factors are associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in both high and low incidence homes.
SETTING: 78 National HealthCorp nursing homes.
SUBJECTS: We studied 4232 nursing home residents free of pressure ulcers on admission to a nursing facility and at 3-months follow-up. All remained in the home for at least 3 additional months to a maximum of 21 months. MEASUREMENTS: The effects of age, gender, race, antipsychotic drug use, urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, disorientation, ambulation, physical restraints, activities of daily living of bathing, feeding, or transferring, and nursing home bed size on the formation of a stage II-IV pressure ulcer while the subject was a resident in the nursing home were studied. MAIN
RESULTS: Significant factors associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in high incidence homes (21-month incidence = 19.3%) were ambulation difficulty (OR = 3.3; CI = 2.0, 5.3), fecal incontinence (OR = 2.5; CI = 1.6, 4.0), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.7; CI = 1.2, 2.5), and difficulty feeding oneself (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.5, 3.3). In the low incidence homes (21-month incidence = 6.5%), significant factors associated with pressure ulcer incidence were ambulation difficulty (OR = 3.6; CI = 1.7, 7.4), difficulty feeding oneself (OR = 3.5; CI = 2.0, 6.3), and male gender (OR = 1.9; CI = 1.2, 3.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Although low and high incidence homes share similar risk factors, such as ambulation and feeding activities of daily living, the main difference was that diabetes and fecal incontinence played a major role only in high risk homes, while male gender was an important discriminator only in low incidence homes. Yet, it is unclear if these factors explain the three-fold difference in the incidence rates for pressure ulcers in these facilities. Baseline or resident clinical characteristic differences of any one factor between the high and low incidence homes varied by no more than 5%. While we identified certain conditions which are associated with pressure ulcer formation, there may be unknown or unmeasured facility effects in addition to the characteristics of a given resident in a particular home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8144823     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07486.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  19 in total

1.  The limits of pressure sore prevention.

Authors:  S Hagisawa; J Barbenel
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The relationship of Medicaid payment rates, bed constraint policies, and risk-adjusted pressure ulcers.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Joseph J Angelelli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  High-grade decubitus ulcers in the elderly : A Postmortem Case-Control Study of Risk Factors.

Authors:  K Pueschel; A Heinemann; T Krause; S Anders; W von Renteln-Kruse
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 4.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

5.  2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Perceptions of "futile care" among caregivers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Robert Sibbald; James Downar; Laura Hawryluck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing a DPP4 Inhibitor (Linagliptin) and Basal Insulin (Glargine) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Long-term Care and Skilled Nursing Facilities: Linagliptin-LTC Trial.

Authors:  Guillermo E Umpierrez; Saumeth Cardona; David Chachkhiani; Maya Fayfman; Sahebi Saiyed; Heqiong Wang; Priyathama Vellanki; J Sonya Haw; Darin E Olson; Francisco J Pasquel; Theodore M Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Development of the interRAI Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale (PURS) for use in long-term care and home care settings.

Authors:  Jeff Poss; Katharine M Murphy; M Gail Woodbury; Heather Orsted; Kimberly Stevenson; Gail Williams; Shirley Macalpine; Nancy Curtin-Telegdi; John P Hirdes
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Complications in patients with spinal cord injuries sustained in an earthquake in Northern Pakistan.

Authors:  Syeda Fizza Tauqir; Shirin Mirza; Shahzad Gul; Hirra Ghaffar; Asif Zafar
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 10.  Urinary and fecal incontinence in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; John F Schnelle
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.