Literature DB >> 8144245

Antibacterial properties of eight dental cements.

M M Coogan1, P J Creaven.   

Abstract

The antibacterial action of a light-cured glass polyalkenoate Vitrebond and an adhesive resin luting agent Panavia Ex was investigated and compared with six previously tested dental cements. The bacterial cultures used were six strains of Streptococcus mutans, six of Streptococcus sanguis and six cultures of carious debris from carious lesions. A modification of the agar diffusion method was used to test the antibacterial action of freshly mixed cements. In addition the cements were allowed to set and their antimicrobial action was tested by incubation for 5 days in sucrose broth inoculated with the test cultures. All the freshly mixed materials had an antibacterial action. A two-way analysis of variance and Tukey-Student range analysis showed that Vitrebond had a significantly greater zone of inhibition than Aquacem, IRM, Dycal, Dycal VLC, Ceramco and GC Elite (P = 0.001). Freshly mixed Panavia Ex exhibited minimal antibacterial action. After 5 days the antibacterial properties of all the cements were reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8144245     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00769.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of pH at the bacteria-dental cement interface.

Authors:  G Mayanagi; K Igarashi; J Washio; K Nakajo; H Domon-Tawaraya; N Takahashi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Effect of antibacterial agents on the surface hardness of a conventional glass-ionomer cement.

Authors:  Tamer Tüzüner; Tezer Ulusu
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Comparison of indirect pulp treatment and iRoot BP Plus pulpotomy in primary teeth with extremely deep caries: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Chen; Hongmei Zhang; Jie Zhong; Wenjuan Yan; Bichen Lin; Meili Ding; Shihua Xue; Bin Xia
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Nishmitha N Hegde; Shruthi H Attavar; Mithra N Hegde; G Priya
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Type II Glass lonomer Cement, Type IX Glass lonomer Cement, and AMALGOMER™ Ceramic Reinforcement by Modified "Direct Contact Test": An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Shivayogi M Hugar; Harsha G Assudani; Vidyavathi Patil; Pratibha Kukreja; Chaitanya Uppin; Prachi Thakkar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 6.  Calcium hydroxide liners: a literature review.

Authors:  Naji Ziad Arandi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2017-07-13

7.  Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Hanaa Elgamily; Omaima Ghallab; Hoda El-Sayed; Maha Nasr
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-04-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.