Literature DB >> 8142152

Measurement and valuation of quality of life in economic appraisal of cancer treatment.

C A Uyl-de Groot1, F F Rutten, G J Bonsel.   

Abstract

In the economic evaluation (EE) of technologies in cancer treatment at least three endpoints are relevant: costs, survival and quality of life (QoL). This article is focused on QoL. EE requires the use of generic and valuation QoL instruments at a disease non-specific level, but the inclusion of cancer-specific instruments may be advisable, particularly for reasons of explanation if changes in dimensions are small or conflicting. Given the pros and cons of the available questionnaires, we advocate the use of the Nottingham Health Profile, the EuroQol and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. In our experience the QoL issue in EE linked with cancer trials is associated with practical problems like questionnaire composition, follow-up time, interviewing schedule, patients' compliance and doctors' acceptance. These problems are discussed and some practical guidelines for the design of QoL measurement in cancer trials are given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8142152     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80030-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

1.  Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hanna van Waart; Johanna M van Dongen; Wim H van Harten; Martijn M Stuiver; Rosalie Huijsmans; Jeannette A J H Hellendoorn-van Vreeswijk; Gabe S Sonke; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-10-30

2.  A study of the reliability of health state valuations in the Japanese EuroQol instrument.

Authors:  C Hamashima; K Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Design of the Physical exercise during Adjuvant Chemotherapy Effectiveness Study (PACES): a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physical exercise in improving physical fitness and reducing fatigue.

Authors:  Hanna van Waart; Martijn M Stuiver; Wim H van Harten; Gabe S Sonke; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  Economic and health-related quality of life considerations of new therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  L M Rubenstein; A DeLeo; E A Chrischilles
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Treatment costs and quality of life with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with antineoplastic therapy-related febrile neutropenia. Results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  C A Uyl-de Groot; E Vellenga; E G de Vries; B Löwenberg; G J Stoter; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Quality of life in patients with non-metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer under thyroxine supplementation therapy.

Authors:  Richard Crevenna; Georg Zettinig; Mohammad Keilani; Martin Posch; Manuela Schmidinger; Christian Pirich; Martin Nuhr; Michael Wolzt; Michael Quittan; Veronika Fialka-Moser; Robert Dudczak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Physical Activity Types and Health-Related Quality of Life among Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  C M Koolhaas; K Dhana; F J A van Rooij; J D Schoufour; A Hofman; O H Franco
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Alpe d'HuZes cancer rehabilitation (A-CaRe) research: four randomized controlled exercise trials and economic evaluations in cancer patients and survivors.

Authors:  Mai J M Chinapaw; Laurien M Buffart; Willem van Mechelen; Goof Schep; Neil K Aaronson; Wim H van Harten; Martijn M Stuiver; Marie José Kersten; Frans Nollet; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Jaap Huisman; Tim Takken; Maurits van Tulder; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-06

9.  Design of the PROstate cancer follow-up care in Secondary and Primary hEalth Care study (PROSPEC): a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of primary care-based follow-up of localized prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Barbara M Wollersheim; Kristel M van Asselt; Henk G van der Poel; Henk C P M van Weert; Michael Hauptmann; Valesca P Retèl; Neil K Aaronson; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Annelies H Boekhout
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.