Literature DB >> 8141598

The effects of preloads varying in physical state and fat content on satiety and energy intake.

T Hulshof1, C De Graaf, J A Weststrate.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of the physical state and fat content of a preload on feelings of hunger and satiety and subsequent energy intake. Thirty-three normal-weight female subjects each received nine different 550-ml preloads which were served as breakfast. The preloads differed in physical state and fat level. There were three types of physical state (liquid, solid with locust bean gum, and solid with gelatin) combined with three energy levels (0.42, 1.67, and 3.35 MJ). The energy differences were due only to differences in fat content. Subjects were not allowed to eat or drink (except water) for 3.5 h after preload consumption. In this period they rated their feelings of appetite. Subjects recorded their voluntary food intake for the remainder of the study day and the day after the study day. There were no effects of the different amounts of fat or the three different physical states on energy intake during the remainder of the day or the day after. With respect to the appetite ratings, however, it appeared that the solid preloads were more satiating than the liquid preloads and the solid preloads were more satiating with fibre (locust bean gum) than without fibre (gelatin). The high-fat preloads were more satiating than the low-fat preloads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8141598     DOI: 10.1006/appe.1993.1045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  11 in total

1.  Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin; Kiyah J Duffey
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Satiety and energy intake after single and repeated exposure to gel-forming dietary fiber: post-ingestive effects.

Authors:  A J Wanders; M Mars; K J Borgonjen-van den Berg; C de Graaf; E J M Feskens
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 3.  Impact of fat substitutes on fat intake.

Authors:  G D Miller; S M Groziak
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.880

4.  Targeted Beverage Taxes Influence Food and Beverage Purchases among Households with Preschool Children.

Authors:  Christopher N Ford; Shu Wen Ng; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 5.  Current Knowledge Base of Beverage Health Impacts, Trends, and Intake Recommendations for Children and Adolescents: Implications for Public Health.

Authors:  Molly K Parker; Brenda M Davy; Valisa E Hedrick
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 6.  Physiology of Food Intake Control in Children.

Authors:  G Harvey Anderson; Sascha Hunschede; Rajadurai Akilen; Ruslan Kubant
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

7.  Evaluation of study design variables and their impact on food-maintained operant responding in mice.

Authors:  Desirae M Haluk; Kevin Wickman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Short-term dietary compensation in free-living adults.

Authors:  F McKiernan; J H Hollis; R D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-12-26

9.  Effects of fruit and vegetable, consumed in solid vs beverage forms, on acute and chronic appetitive responses in lean and obese adults.

Authors:  J A Houchins; S-Y Tan; W W Campbell; R D Mattes
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 10.  Factors that determine energy compensation: a systematic review of preload studies.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Luigi Palla; Kathryn Guest; Cassandra Ricchiuti; Neil Vint; Susan A Jebb; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.