Literature DB >> 8141496

Assessment of vertebral canal diameter and bony malformations of the cervical part of the spine in horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy.

B R Moore1, S M Reed, D S Biller, C W Kohn, S E Weisbrode.   

Abstract

Magnification of cervical radiographs prevents accurate interpretation of vertebral canal absolute minimum sagittal diameter (MSD) values and application of the established MSD values for diagnosis of cervical stenotic myelopathy (CSM). Variability in MSD determination in human beings, owing to radiographic magnification, is minimized by assessing a ratio of the vertebral canal diameter to the sagittal width of the vertebral body. This relative measurement technique improves the accuracy of diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis in human beings. The MSD of the vertebral canal was determined in 50 horses with CSM and 50 control horses, using a radiopaque marker method for correction of magnification. In addition, a ratio of the absolute MSD to the sagittal width of the vertebral body and a ratio of the absolute MSD to the length of the vertebral body were determined in 100 CSM-affected and 100 control horses. Response operating characteristic curve analysis of each method determined that the sagittal ratio method of canal diameter assessment provided the most accurate interpretation of cervical radiographs for diagnosis of CSM, with sensitivity and specificity of > or = 89% at each vertebral site. The accuracy of the ratio method, without consideration of bony malformation, supports the importance, and perhaps prerequisite, of generalized vertebral canal stenosis in the pathogenesis of CSM. Subjective evaluation of bony malformations from cervical radiographs of 100 CSM-affected horses and 100 control horses indicated that CSM-affected horses have more severe bony malformation than do control horses. However, moderate to marked degenerative joint disease of the articular processes was frequently observed in control horses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8141496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  7 in total

1.  Tri-level surgical treatment of cervical spinal cord compression in a Thoroughbred yearling.

Authors:  Nick Huggons
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Evaluation of traditional and novel radiographic vertebral ratios in Great Danes with versus without cervical spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  Paula Martin-Vaquero; Ronaldo C da Costa
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 1.363

3.  Outcomes after cervical vertebral interbody fusion using an interbody fusion device and polyaxial pedicle screw and rod construct in 10 horses (2015-2019).

Authors:  Lynn M Pezzanite; Jeremiah T Easley; Rosemary Bayless; Ellison Aldrich; Brad B Nelson; Howard B Seim; Yvette S Nout-Lomas
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Repeatability and intra- and inter-observer agreement of cervical vertebral sagittal diameter ratios in horses with neurological disease.

Authors:  K J Hughes; E H Laidlaw; S M Reed; J Keen; J B Abbott; T Trevail; G Hammond; T D H Parkin; S Love
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Characterization of bony changes localized to the cervical articular processes in a mixed population of horses.

Authors:  Kevin K Haussler; Roy R Pool; Hilary M Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accuracy of transcranial magnetic stimulation and a Bayesian latent class model for diagnosis of spinal cord dysfunction in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Els Raes; Sebastien Buczinski; Michèle Dumoulin; Piet Deprez; Luc Van Ham; Gunther van Loon; Bart Pardon
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Determination of magnetic motor evoked potential latency time cutoff values for detection of spinal cord dysfunction in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Bart Pardon; Veronique Saey; Els Raes; Luc Van Ham; Richard Ducatelle; Gunther van Loon; Piet Deprez
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.