Literature DB >> 8140249

Technologic considerations and practical limitations in the use of quantitative angiography during percutaneous coronary recanalization.

B H Strauss1, J Escaned, D P Foley, C di Mario, J Haase, D Keane, W R Hermans, P J de Feyter, P W Serruys.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 8140249     DOI： 10.1016/s0033-0620(05)80026-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN： 0033-0620            Impact factor:   8.194


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories.

Authors:  P A Sirnes; Y Myreng; P Mølstad; S Golf
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-09

Review 2.  The Clinical Significance of Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Chandra P Ojha; Ahmed Ibrahim; Timir K Paul; Venkatachalam Mulukutla; Harsha S Nagarajarao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; Giovanni Luigi de Maria; Guido Knapp; Nick Curzen; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Georg M Fröhlich; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.298
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.