Literature DB >> 8139301

A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation.

M G Stineman1, J J Escarce, J E Goin, B B Hamilton, C V Granger, S V Williams.   

Abstract

Dissatisfaction with Medicare's current system of paying for rehabilitation care has led to proposals for a rehabilitation prospective payment system, but first a classification system for rehabilitation patients must be created. Data for 36,980 patients admitted to and discharged from 125 rehabilitation facilities between January 1, 1990, and April 19, 1991, were provided by the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Classification rules were formed using clinical judgment and a recursive partitioning algorithm. The Functional Independence Measure version of the Function Related Groups (FIM-FRGs) uses four predictor variables: diagnosis leading to disability, admission scores for motor and cognitive functional status subscales as measured by the Functional Independence Measure, and patient age. The system contains 53 FRGs and explains 31.3% of the variance in the natural logarithm length of stay for patients in a validation sample. The FIM-FRG classification system is conceptually simple and stable when tested on a validation sample. The classification system contains a manageable number of groups, and may represent a solution to the problem of classifying medical rehabilitation patients for payment, facility planning, and research on the outcomes, quality, and cost of rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8139301     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199404000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  28 in total

1.  Patterns of change in depression after stroke.

Authors:  Glenn V Ostir; Ivonne-M Berges; Allison Ottenbacher; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Development of function-related groups version 2.0: a classification system for medical rehabilitation.

Authors:  M G Stineman; C J Tassoni; J J Escarce; J E Goin; C V Granger; R C Fiedler; S V Williams
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Change in positive emotion and recovery of functional status following stroke.

Authors:  Gary S Seale; Ivonne-Marie Berges; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Glenn V Ostir
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2010-02

4.  The effects of robot assisted gait training on temporal-spatial characteristics of people with spinal cord injuries: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen Clive Hayes; Christopher Richard James Wilcox; Hollie Samantha Forbes White; Natalie Vanicek
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Utility of functional status for classifying community versus institutional discharges after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke.

Authors:  Timothy A Reistetter; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Carl V Granger; Samuel Markello; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Health status assessment. Completing the clinical database.

Authors:  A W Wu; K A Cagney; P D St John
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Hospital readmission in persons with stroke following postacute inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  K J Ottenbacher; J E Graham; A J Ottenbacher; J Lee; S Al Snih; A Karmarkar; T Reistetter; G V Ostir
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  In-patient rehabilitation outcomes following lower extremity fracture in patients with pneumonia.

Authors:  Ijaz Ahmed; James E Graham; Amol M Karmarkar; Carl V Granger; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.258

9.  Racial and ethnic differences in postacute rehabilitation outcomes after stroke in the United States.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Joanna Campbell; Yong-Fang Kuo; Anne Deutsch; Glenn V Ostir; Carl V Granger
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Using administrative data to study persons with disabilities.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.