Literature DB >> 8138309

Repair versus replacement of failed restorations.

I A Mjör1.   

Abstract

Detailed criteria are needed to establish what constitutes failures which call for replacement or repair of restorations. Many factors play a role in the selection of repair as an alternative to replacement of failed restorations, including the clinical condition, the restorative material involved, and cost/benefit assessments. The advantages of repair of localised defects include saving of tooth structure and increased longevity of restorations at a low cost.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8138309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.512


  10 in total

1.  Repair of dental resin-based composites.

Authors:  Veronika Baur; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; Saulo Geraldeli; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey L Fellows; H Paul Kellum; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Attitudes of Greek dentists towards repair of conservative restorations. An online survey.

Authors:  Antoniadou Maria; Paximada Charikleia; Lagouvardos Panagiotis
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 2.607

4.  In vitro repair of fractured fiber-reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Cees M Kreulen; Arzu Tezvergil; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Nico H J Creugers
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-09-15

5.  Effect of an Extra Hydrophobic Resin Layer on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-Based Composite Resin.

Authors:  Narmin Mohammadi; Mahmoud Bahari; Soodabeh Kimyai; Behnam Rahbani Nobar
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-12

6.  Effectiveness of different resin composite materials for repairing noncarious amalgam margin defects.

Authors:  Burak Gumustas; Soner Sismanoglu
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

7.  Decision criteria for replacement of fillings: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J Kirsch; J Tchorz; E Hellwig; T T Tauböck; T Attin; C Hannig
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2016-07-04

8.  Repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatment and type of composite.

Authors:  Maryam Ghavam; Maryam Naeemi; Sedighe-Sadat Hashemikamangar; Hooman Ebrahimi; Mohammad-Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 9.  Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite.

Authors:  Mohammad O Sharif; Melanie Catleugh; Alison Merry; Martin Tickle; Stephen M Dunne; Paul Brunton; Vishal R Aggarwal; Lee Yee Chong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-08

Review 10.  Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam.

Authors:  Mohammad O Sharif; Alison Merry; Melanie Catleugh; Martin Tickle; Paul Brunton; Stephen M Dunne; Vishal R Aggarwal; Lee Yee Chong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.