Literature DB >> 8137976

Micromanipulation of human embryos to assist hatching.

A Dokras1, C Ross, B Gosden, I L Sargent, D H Barlow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of zona slitting and subsequent embryo transfer performed on different days of in vitro human embryonic development to allow appropriate application of assisted hatching techniques to clinical IVF-ET.
DESIGN: A microsurgical technique was used to make a standardized slit in the zona pellucida of bipronucleate human embryos on day 2, 3, or 5 after oocyte retrieval. A mock ET was performed after the procedure and the rate of blastocyst formation and the process of hatching in each embryo was monitored.
SETTING: All embryos used were donated for research by patients attending the IVF Unit at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effects of the mock ET on the integrity of zona-slit embryos was documented. The embryos were cultured further and parameters such as blastocyst formation, initiation, and completion of hatching were monitored in all three groups of embryos.
RESULTS: The mock ET did not have a detrimental effect on embryos as assessed by their morphology and subsequent blastocyst formation rate. The technique used in this study to make an opening in the zona increased the rate and number of blastocysts hatching in all three groups compared with nonmanipulated controls. However, the day on which the slit was made did not significantly alter the outcome.
CONCLUSION: A gap in the zona pellucida of human embryos significantly increases the rate of hatching. Micromanipulative techniques such as zona slitting can be suitably used for this purpose without loss of blastomeres through the gap in the zona or trapping of the embryo during the process of hatching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8137976     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56585-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  A study failing to determine significant benefits from assisted hatching: patients selected for advanced age, zonal thickness of embryos, and previous failed attempts.

Authors:  W R Edirisinghe; V Ahnonkitpanit; S Promviengchai; S Suwajanakorn; K Pruksananonda; V Chinpilas; P Virutamasen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Authors:  Sarah-Kate Carney; Sangeeta Das; Debbie Blake; Cindy Farquhar; Mourad M W Seif; Linsey Nelson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

3.  Does assisted hatching improve implantation rates after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in all patients? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  S Hellebaut; P De Sutter; D Dozortsev; A Onghena; C Qian; M Dhont
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)).

Authors:  Lauren Lacey; Sibte Hassan; Sebastian Franik; Mourad W Seif; M Ahsan Akhtar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.