Literature DB >> 8136836

Direct isolation of polymorphic markers linked to a trait by genetically directed representational difference analysis.

N A Lisitsyn1, J A Segre, K Kusumi, N M Lisitsyn, J H Nadeau, W N Frankel, M H Wigler, E S Lander.   

Abstract

We describe a technique, genetically directed representational difference analysis (GDRDA), for specifically generating genetic markers linked to a trait of interest. GDRDA is applicable, in principle, to virtually any organism, because it requires neither prior knowledge of the chromosomal location of the gene controlling the trait nor the availability of a pre-existing genetic map. Based on a subtraction technique described recently called representational difference analysis, GDRDA uses the principles of transmission genetics to create appropriate Tester and Driver samples for subtraction. We demonstrate the usefulness of GDRDA by, for example, successfully targeting three polymorphisms to an interval of less than 1 cM of the mouse nude locus of chromosome 11.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8136836     DOI: 10.1038/ng0194-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  20 in total

1.  Representational difference analysis of a committed myeloid progenitor cell line reveals evidence for bilineage potential.

Authors:  N D Lawson; N Berliner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Positional cloning without a genome map: using 'Targeted RFLP Subtraction' to isolate dense markers tightly linked to the regA locus of Volvox carteri.

Authors:  J Corrette-Bennett; M Rosenberg; M Przybylska; E Ananiev; D Straus
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  YAC/P1 contigs defining the location of 56 microsatellite markers and several genes across a 3.4-cM interval on mouse chromosome 11.

Authors:  M Nehls; K Lüno; M Schorpp; D Pfeifer; S Krause; U Matysiak-Scholze; H Dierbach; T Boehm
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Direct detection and isolation of restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) spot DNA markers tightly linked to a specific trait by using the RLGS spot-bombing method.

Authors:  Y Okazaki; K Hirose; S Hirotsune; H Okuizumi; N Sasaki; T Ohsumi; A Yoshiki; M Kusakabe; M Muramatsu; J Kawai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Direct isolation of cDNA sequences from specific chromosomal regions of the tomato genome by the differential display technique.

Authors:  U Hannappel; H J Balzer; M W Ganal
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1995-11-01

Review 6.  From mutation mapping to phenotype cloning.

Authors:  J J Jonsson; S M Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Zfp30, a KRAB domain containing zinc finger protein gene, maps to mouse chromosome 7.

Authors:  P Denny; A Ashworth
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA.

Authors:  M Hubank; D G Schatz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Identification by representational difference analysis of a homozygous deletion in pancreatic carcinoma that lies within the BRCA2 region.

Authors:  M Schutte; L T da Costa; S A Hahn; C Moskaluk; A T Hoque; E Rozenblum; C L Weinstein; M Bittner; P S Meltzer; J M Trent
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Differences in expression of retinal pigment epithelium mRNA between normal canines.

Authors:  Heather L J Hanik; Matthew E Loewen; Greg D Appleyard; Bruce H Grahn; George W Forsyth
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.