Literature DB >> 8136514

Clinical studies to assess the economic impact of new therapies: pragmatic approaches to measuring costs.

V Kirchner1.   

Abstract

Pragmatic clinical trials using unselected patients in normal clinical situations are more appropriate for the economic assessment of new drugs. However, standard clinical studies that do not reflect current practice are useful and at present the only source of information. Anti-emetic drug studies using granisetron and ondansetron have demonstrated that the overall economic impact of these drugs is equivalent to standard therapies such as metoclopramide. Thus, an efficient anti-emetic drug with less frequent dosing, using a simplified dosage regimen and producing a reduction in anticipatory nausea and vomiting and in nursing time, may result in an overall reduction in cost. Decisions made purely on the basis of drug costs may be misleading and promote inefficient use of health resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8136514     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-199312003-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  3 in total

1.  The problem of protocol driven costs in pharmacoeconomic analysis.

Authors:  D Coyle; K M Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Granisetron. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Once more: prevention of nausea and emesis in cancer treatment.

Authors:  M S Aapro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.