Literature DB >> 8135213

Risk factors associated with temporomandibular joint sounds in children 6 to 12 years of age.

S D Keeling1, S McGorray, T T Wheeler, G J King.   

Abstract

The relationship between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds and a person's dental and skeletal characteristics is poorly understood. In this study, data were obtained from 3428 grade schoolchildren (mean age = 9.0 years, SD = 0.8, range 6 to 12 years), without a history of orthodontic treatment. Each child had been examined independently by one of six orthodontists to assess: TMJ sounds (none, click, crepitus), gender, age, race (white/black), skeletal relationships (convexity, maxillary, and mandibular positions), malocclusion (molar class, overjet, overbite, anterior crowding, posterior crossbite), maximum opening, chin trauma (none, cut, scar), and history of lower facial trauma. Temporomandibular joint sounds were present in 344 children (10.0% of the sample); 276 (8.1%) had an isolated unilateral sound, 254 (7.4%) had unilateral clicking, 50 (1.5%) had bilateral clicking, 22 (0.6%) had unilateral crepitus, and 11 (0.3%) had bilateral crepitus. Univariate analyses compared children with and without sounds for each variable; logistic regression analyses examined the relationship between groups of variables and TMJ sounds. The prevalence of TMJ sounds was associated with examiner (chi 2 = 23.4, df = 5, p < 0.001); increased prevalence of TMJ sounds occurred in children with maxillary anterior crowding (t = 2.8, p < 0.006), mandibular anterior crowding (t = 3.0, p < 0.002), and increased maximum opening (t = 4.7, p < 0.001). In contrast to other reports on children, the prevalence of joint sounds was not associated with age, race, gender, or molar class.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8135213     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70122-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  Computerized ultrasonic axiographic evaluation of condylar movement in patients with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Byung-Taek Choi; Dae-Young Hwang; Gye-Hyeong Lee; Da-Nal Moon; Kyung-Min Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Condyle fossa relationship associated with functional posterior crossbite, before and after rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Rosalia Leonardi; Mario Caltabiano; Costanza Cavallini; Edoardo Sicurezza; Ersilia Barbato; Concetto Spampinato; Daniela Giordano
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effects of the Vertical Malocclusion Types on the Dimension of the Mandibular Condyle.

Authors:  Merve Göymen; Ayşegül Güleç
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions in urban Saudi Arabian adolescents: a research report.

Authors:  Rabab M Feteih
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 5.  Craniomandibular disorders and mandibular reference position in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Farid Bourzgui; Hakima Aghoutan; Samir Diouny
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-09-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.