Literature DB >> 8134613

Use of health records in research: reliability and validity issues.

L S Aaronson1, M E Burman.   

Abstract

Data extracted from health records are commonly used in studies to address a variety of questions raised by health researchers. However, concern about the reliability and validity of such data generally is limited to an assessment of interrater reliability. Less attention has been paid to the reliability of the health record itself, and to the validity of both the health record and the data extracted from it. This article reviews the distinctions and overlaps among these types of reliability and validity and the factors that influence the validity and reliability of research data obtained from health records. Recommendations to investigators who use health record data in their research projects are offered.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8134613     DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770170110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  7 in total

1.  Use of measurement audit in outcomes management.

Authors:  John S Lyons; Purva Rawal; Irene Yeh; Scott C Leon; Peter Tracy
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  A method for rating charts to identify and classify patients with medically unexplained symptoms.

Authors:  Robert C Smith; Elie Korban; Mohammed Kanj; Robert Haddad; Judith S Lyles; Catherine Lein; Joseph C Gardiner; Annemarie Hodges; Francesca C Dwamena; John Coffey; Clare Collins
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  Agreement between CASA parent reports and provider records of children's ADHD services.

Authors:  Regina Bussing; Dana M Mason; Christina E Leon; Karabi Sinha
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of predicting somatization from patients' ICD-9 diagnoses.

Authors:  Robert C Smith; Joseph C Gardiner; Zhehui Luo; Kathryn Rost
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M Hann; J Hacker; A Durie; A Thapar; M O Roland
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

6.  Structured Chart Review: Assessment of a Structured Chart Review Methodology.

Authors:  Ashley Siems; Russell Banks; Richard Holubkov; Kathleen L Meert; Christian Bauerfeld; David Beyda; Robert A Berg; Yonca Bulut; Randall S Burd; Joseph Carcillo; J Michael Dean; Eleanor Gradidge; Mark W Hall; Patrick S McQuillen; Peter M Mourani; Christopher J L Newth; Daniel A Notterman; Margaret A Priestley; Anil Sapru; David L Wessel; Andrew R Yates; Athena F Zuppa; Murray M Pollack
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2020-01

7.  Measures for assessing practice change in medical practitioners.

Authors:  Sharon Hakkennes; Sally Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 7.327

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.